Carbohydrate Physicochemical Properties: The Innate Hydrogen Bond Donating Capacities of α‐Glucoside and α‐Galactoside Alcohol Groups

M Mrinal Naskar (Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Campus Sterre Ghent University Ghent Belgium) Z Zhong Wang (Alan G. MacDiarmid NanoTech Institute, University of Texas at Dallas) K Krunal Patel (School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering University of Southampton Southampton UK) B Branko De Baets (Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Campus Sterre Ghent University Ghent Belgium) A Anaïs Goupille (CEISAM UMR CNRS 6230 CNRS Nantes Université Nantes France) D Davy Sinnaeve (CNRS, Univ. Lille Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR 9031 – Integrative Structural Biology Lille France) E Eric Renault (CEISAM UMR CNRS 6230 CNRS Nantes Université Nantes France) J Jean‐Yves Le Questel (CEISAM UMR CNRS 6230 CNRS Nantes Université Nantes France) B Bruno Linclau (Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Campus Sterre Ghent University Ghent Belgium)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Despite the significance of hydrogen bonding in protein‐carbohydrate interactions, carbohydrate conformation, and crystallinity (solubility), relative hydrogen bond donating capacities (HBDC) of individual alcohol groups of a given sugar are poorly characterised. Here the first systematic determination of the HBDC of individual sugar alcohol groups has been achieved, which were ranked in a HB‐scale (p K AHY ‐scale) that is relevant for medicinal chemistry purposes. HB determination was achieved using an IR‐based protocol with methyl α‐glucoside‐ and α‐galactoside‐based model compounds that exclude any contributions from HB cooperativity effects. A wide variation in HBDC was found, especially for galactose, with a strong stereochemical dependence not only of the alcohol group itself, but also at adjacent and even remote positions. The glucose 4‐OH and, notably, the galactose 6‐OH groups were the strongest donors, whereas the glucose 2‐OH and, notably, the galactose 4‐OH groups were the weakest donors. Interestingly, the galactose 6‐OH is the only group with a stronger HBDC than cyclohexanol. These differences could be qualitatively rationalised by a combined IR, NMR, and computational analysis, pointing to counteracting influences from inductive and the often multiple possible intramolecular hydrogen‐bonding effects. The difference between the factors that determine carbohydrate HB donating capacities and Brønsted acidities is discussed.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 1, Issue 1
Published June 16, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (9)

M

Mrinal Naskar

Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Campus Sterre Ghent University Ghent Belgium

Z

Zhong Wang

Alan G. MacDiarmid NanoTech Institute, University of Texas at Dallas

K

Krunal Patel

School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering University of Southampton Southampton UK

B

Branko De Baets

Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Campus Sterre Ghent University Ghent Belgium

A

Anaïs Goupille

CEISAM UMR CNRS 6230 CNRS Nantes Université Nantes France

D

Davy Sinnaeve

CNRS, Univ. Lille Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR 9031 – Integrative Structural Biology Lille France

E

Eric Renault

CEISAM UMR CNRS 6230 CNRS Nantes Université Nantes France

J

Jean‐Yves Le Questel

CEISAM UMR CNRS 6230 CNRS Nantes Université Nantes France

B

Bruno Linclau

Department of Organic and Macromolecular Chemistry Campus Sterre Ghent University Ghent Belgium