Capivasertib plus fulvestrant in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: phase 3 CAPItello-291 study extended Chinese cohort

X Xichun Hu (Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China) Q Qingyuan Zhang (Department of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China) T Tao Sun H Huihua Xiong W Wei Li Y Yuee Teng Y Yen-Shen Lu (Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Cancer Center Branch) L Ling-Ming Tseng M Min Yan H Hongsheng Li D Danmei Pang S Shin-Cheh -Chen W Wenyan Chen O Ou Jiang J Jingfen Wang X Xinhong Wu X Xian Wang (School of Chemistry and Materials Science) A Aimin Zang (Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China) X Xiaojia Wang (Department of Mechanical Engineering) J Julie M. Collins E Ethan Fan L Lin Jiang X Xiaoling Zeng N Nicholas C. Turner

Abstract

Abstract In the global CAPItello-291 randomized phase 3 study (NCT04305496) in patients with hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer and progression during/after aromatase inhibitor treatment, capivasertib–fulvestrant significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in the overall population and patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors versus placebo–fulvestrant. We assessed efficacy and safety of capivasertib–fulvestrant in a prespecified exploratory analysis of a Chinese cohort (n = 24) and extended study with the same protocol (n = 110). Clinically meaningful PFS benefit for capivasertib–fulvestrant was observed in the overall population (median PFS: 6.9 [capivasertib–fulvestrant] versus 2.8 [placebo–fulvestrant] months; hazard ratio 0.51, 95% CI 0.34–0.76), patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors (n = 46; 5.7 versus 1.9 months; hazard ratio 0.41, 95% CI 0.19–0.85) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors (patients with confirmed next-generation sequencing results [n = 68]; 9.2 versus 2.7 months; hazard ratio 0.38; 95% CI 0.21–0.68). The most frequent adverse events (AEs) with capivasertib–fulvestrant were diarrhea (60.6% versus 11.3% with placebo–fulvestrant) and hyperglycemia (57.7% versus 17.7%). AEs leading to capivasertib–fulvestrant discontinuation were reported in 11.3% of patients versus 3.2% for placebo–fulvestrant. The benefit-risk profile of capivasertib–fulvestrant in the Chinese cohort was favorable; further exploration in patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-non-altered tumors is warranted.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 16, Issue 1
Published May 09, 2025
ISSN 2041-1723
Publisher Nature Portfolio

Journal Info

Nature Communications

Nature Portfolio

ISSN: 2041-1723 Open Access Life Sciences

Authors (24)

X

Xichun Hu

Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Q

Qingyuan Zhang

Department of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China

T

Tao Sun

H

Huihua Xiong

W

Wei Li

Y

Yuee Teng

Y

Yen-Shen Lu

Department of Medical Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Cancer Center Branch

L

Ling-Ming Tseng

M

Min Yan

H

Hongsheng Li

D

Danmei Pang

S

Shin-Cheh -Chen

W

Wenyan Chen

O

Ou Jiang

J

Jingfen Wang

X

Xinhong Wu

X

Xian Wang

School of Chemistry and Materials Science

A

Aimin Zang

Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, China

X

Xiaojia Wang

Department of Mechanical Engineering

J

Julie M. Collins

E

Ethan Fan

L

Lin Jiang

X

Xiaoling Zeng

N

Nicholas C. Turner