C4d, a high-affinity LilrB2 ligand, is elevated in Alzheimer’s disease and mediates synapse pruning

B Barbara K. Brott (Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University) A Aram J. Raissi (Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University) K Kristina D. Micheva (Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University) J Jost Vielmetter (Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology) M Monique S. Mendes (Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University) C Caroline J. Baccus (Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University) J Jolie Huang (Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University) C Carla J. Shatz (Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University)

Abstract

Synapse pruning sculpts neural circuits throughout life. The human Leukocyte immunoglobulin-like receptor type B2 (LilrB2)/murine Paired immunoglobulin receptor B (PirB) receptors expressed in neurons and complement protein C4 have been separately implicated in pruning. Here, we report that C4d, a C4 cleavage product with unknown function, binds LilrB2/PirB with nanomolar affinity. C4d and LilrB2 colocalize at excitatory synapses in the human cerebral cortex as well as with beta amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease (AD). C4d, as well as C4, increase with age and more so in AD. To examine whether C4d-PirB interactions can drive pruning, dendritic spines—the postsynaptic structure of excitatory synapses—were monitored on L5 pyramidal neurons in the mouse cerebral cortex: A significant decrease in dendritic spine density occurred in WT with C4d exposure, but KO of PirB completely prevented this loss. Together, our findings reveal an unexpected physiological role for C4d in pruning and imply that different complement cascade components may collaborate to engage both neuronal and glial-specific effectors of synaptic pruning.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 38
Published September 23, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (8)

B

Barbara K. Brott

Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University

A

Aram J. Raissi

Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University

K

Kristina D. Micheva

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University

J

Jost Vielmetter

Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology

M

Monique S. Mendes

Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University

C

Caroline J. Baccus

Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University

J

Jolie Huang

Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University

C

Carla J. Shatz

Departments of Biology and Neurobiology and Bio-X, James H. Clark Center, Stanford University