C-POST study of adjuvant cemiplimab for high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC): Disease-free survival (DFS) analyses per high-risk criteria and per start time after radiotherapy.
Abstract
6083 Background: C-POST, a phase 3 trial (NCT03969004) in patients (pts) with high risk CSCC after surgery and radiotherapy (RT), demonstrated superior disease-free survival (DFS) for adjuvant cemiplimab (cemi) vs placebo (pbo) (HR, 0.32; P <0.0001); treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 9.8% vs 1.5% of pts (Rischin, et al. N Engl J Med . 2025). With approximately 6 months of additional follow-up, we present exploratory analyses of DFS per high-risk criteria and per the interval between completion of prior RT and study randomization (2-6 wk vs >6 wk). These additional analyses provide key data to understand the importance of risk factors and the impact of time post RT. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 (N=415) to adjuvant cemi or pbo (350 mg cemi or pbo Q3W for 12 wk, then 700 mg cemi or pbo Q6W for 36 wk). All pts had nodal high-risk disease (with extracapsular extension [ECE] and ≥1 node ≥20 mm, or ≥3 nodes regardless of ECE) and/or non-nodal high-risk disease (in-transit metastases, perineural invasion, T4 lesions, or recurrent CSCC with ≥1 other feature). Tumors could meet ≥1 high-risk criteria. Randomization occurred within 2-11 wk after completion of RT. Data cutoff was April 7, 2025. Results: Among 415 pts (209/206 cemi/pbo) randomized, the DFS HR was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.23-0.55) at a median follow-up of 30 months. The most common high-risk criterion was nodal ECE, present in 48.4% of pts (201/415). DFS was improved with cemi vs pbo across all high-risk features, including both nodal and non-nodal criteria (Table 1). A consistent benefit was observed regardless of whether the interval between prior RT completion and study randomization was 2-6 wk (DFS events, 17/117 [14.5%] vs 37/112 [33.0%]; HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.70) or >6 wk (DFS events, 12/91 [13.2%] vs 31/93 [33.3%]; HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.19-0.71). Conclusions: In this phase 3 study, adjuvant cemi demonstrated a DFS benefit vs pbo across all high-risk features and regardless of the interval between prior RT completion and randomization. Clinical trial information: NCT03969004 . DFS with cemi vs pbo: Analyses per high-risk criteria. Criteria a Met high risk criteria, n/N (%) DFS events in cemi arm, n/N (%) DFS events in pbo arm, n/N (%) DFS HR (95% CI) Nodal high risk ECE with ≥1 node ≥20 mm 201/415 (48.4) 14/105 (13.3) 27/96 (28.1) 0.44 (0.23-0.84) ≥3 nodes 71/415 (17.1) 7/34 (20.6) 18/37 (48.6) 0.34 (0.13-0.92) Non-nodal high risk In-transit metastases 41/415 (9.9) 2/20 (10.0) 9/21 (42.9) 0.07 (0.01-0.58) T4 lesion 33/415 (8.0) 6/17 (35.3) 5/16 (31.3) 0.58 (0.16-2.11) Perineural invasion 64/415 (15.4) 3/32 (9.4) 8/32 (25.0) 0.27 (0.07-1.04) Recurrent CSCC with ≥1 additional high-risk criteria 105/415 (25.3) 9/55 (16.4) 22/50 (44.0) 0.19 (0.08-0.45) a Tumors could meet ≥1 high-risk criteria.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Danny Rischin
Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Sandro V. Porceddu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
Fiona Day
Department of Medical Oncology, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, NSW, Australia
Daniel Brungs
Medical Oncology, Cancer Care Wollongong and Graduate School of Medicine, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia
Hayden Robert Christie
Cancer Care Centre Hervey Bay, Queensland, Australia
James Estes Jackson
Radiation Oncology Centers, Gold Coast, Australia
Brian N. Stein
Adelaide Cancer Centre, Adelaide, SA, Australia
Annette May Ling Lim
Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Yungpo Su
Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Nebraska Cancer Specialists, Omaha, NE
Samantha Bowyer
Department of Medical Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia
Naoya Yamazaki
National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo
Paolo Bossi
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan
Armarnath Challapalli
Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol & Weston NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
Rahul Ladwa
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
Axel Hauschild
Department of Dermatology, University Hospital, Kiel, Germany
Debra AG McIntyre
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Frank A. Seebach
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Suk-Young Yoo
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY
Priscila Hermont Goncalves
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, NY
Matthew G. Fury
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, NY