Breast, Colorectal, and Pancreatic Cancer Mortality With Pathogenic Variants in <i>ATM</i> , <i>CHEK2</i> , or <i>PALB2</i>

C Christine M. Veenstra (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) P Paul Abrahamse (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) A Ann S. Hamilton (University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA) K Kevin C. Ward (Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA) S Scarlett L. Gomez (Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA) L Lihua Liu S Steven J. Katz (University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI) T Timothy P. Hofer (Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI) A Allison W. Kurian (Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA)

Abstract

PURPOSE Oncologists encounter patients with pathogenic variants (PVs) in ATM , CHEK2 , or PALB2 , but little is known about their cancer mortality. METHODS Patients who were 20 years or older, diagnosed in 2013-2019 with breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer, and reported to SEER registries in California and Georgia were linked to germline genetic testing results from four clinical laboratories and followed through 2021. Multivariable models of cancer mortality were fit; for each cancer, the reference group was the average hazard across all genetically tested patients with that diagnosis. Each cancer was modeled separately, followed by a single model that interacted the cancer type with all covariates. In addition to fixed effects models, random effects models were used as a regularization approach to reduce overfitting. RESULTS A total of 70,272 tested patients with breast (48,473 estrogen receptor–/progesterone receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative; 9,957 HER2-positive; 11,842 triple-negative) cancer, 5,822 with colorectal cancer, and 1,861 with pancreatic cancer were analyzed; the mean follow-up was 3.9 years. Patients with ATM , CHEK2 , or PALB2 PVs had no differences in breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer mortality. Patients with ATM PVs in triple-negative breast cancer appeared to have higher mortality in fixed effects models (hazard ratio [HR], 3.7 [95% CI, 1.8 to 7.8]), but not in random effects models (HR, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.6]) that reduce overfitting. Patients with BRCA1 / 2 PVs had lower triple-negative breast cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.6 to 0.8]). Patients with Lynch syndrome gene PVs had lower colorectal cancer mortality in both models (fixed HR, 0.5 [95% CI, 0.4 to 0.8], random HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5 to 0.9]). CONCLUSION Patients with ATM , CHEK2 , or PALB2 PVs had similar breast, colorectal, and pancreatic cancer mortality to the average genetically tested patient with their cancer type.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 13
Published May 01, 2025
Pages 1587-1596
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (9)

C

Christine M. Veenstra

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

P

Paul Abrahamse

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

A

Ann S. Hamilton

University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

K

Kevin C. Ward

Emory University, Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA

S

Scarlett L. Gomez

Greater Bay Area Cancer Registry, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

L

Lihua Liu

S

Steven J. Katz

University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI

T

Timothy P. Hofer

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

A

Allison W. Kurian

Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA