Breast cancer screening mammography among transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals: A nationwide study of >10,000 TGD individuals.

E Elizabeth Jane Cathcart-Rake (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) V Viengneesee Thao (Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) J Jennifer Le-Rademacher (Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) D David A. Helfinstine (Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) K Kathryn Jean Ruddy (Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) C Celine Vachon C Caroline Davidge-Pitts (Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) E Evelyn Carroll (Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) J Jennifer Ridgeway (Department of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) C Chrisandra Shufelt (General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL) A Amye Juliet Tevaarwerk (Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN) A Aminah Jatoi (Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN)

Abstract

1530 Background: Regular breast cancer screening reduces mortality. The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends annual screening mammography for asymptomatic, average risk 1) transgender and gender diverse (TGD) men (individuals assigned female sex at birth but identify as men) age 40+ and with residual breast tissue and 2) TGD women (individuals assigned male sex at birth but identify as women) age 40+ and on gender-affirming hormone therapy for 5+ years. This nationwide study investigated screening mammography in TGD individuals. Methods: Four cohorts were identified with complex algorithms of medical and pharmacy data in the OptumLabs Data Warehouse, a longitudinal, administrative insurance claims database that includes patients with commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage: 1) TGD men, 2) TGD women, 3) individuals with gender dysphoria not meeting other TGD criteria (NMOT), and 4) cisgender women -- all of whom met ACR screening criteria. The primary endpoint was the percentage of individuals with high adherence, defined as completing >75% of recommended screenings; comparisons were made across the cohorts (Chi-square test). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare adherence between TGD men and cisgender women with adjustment for demographics and with 1:4 matching (on race/ethnicity, age group, year of healthcare plan enrollment, and duration of follow-up). Results: 10,478 TGD individuals (3,778 TGD men; 1,294 TGD women; and 5,406 with gender dysphoria NMOT) and 6,218,369 cisgender women were identified. For TGD men, TGD women, individuals with gender dysphoria NMOT, and cisgender women, high adherence was observed in 41.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 39.5, 42.6%); 7.4% (95% CI: 6.0, 8.8%); 11.9% (95% CI: 11.0, 12.7%); and 38.3% (95% CI: 38.3, 38.4%), respectively, p < 0.0001. No screening ever in these same populations was observed in 23.6% (95% CI: 22.2, 24.9%); 81.3% (95% CI: 79.2, 83.4%), 72.8% (95% CI: 71.6, 74%), and 35.9% (95% CI: 35.8, 35.9%), respectively, p < 0.0001. When TGD men were matched and compared to 15,112 cisgender women, a differential association was observed between gender and high adherence by age group (p < 0.0001); compared to cisgender women, the likelihood of high adherence in TGD men ages 40-49 (n = 2,472), 50-59 (n = 852), 60-69 (n = 320), and 70+ (n = 134) were as follows: odds ratios (OR‘s): 1.38 (95% CI: 1.28, 1.50), p < 0.0001; 1.57 (95% CI: 1.35, 1.81), p < 0.0001; 0.812 (95% CI: 0.619, 1.065), p = 0.1316; and 1.277 (95% CI 0.835, 1.951), p = 0.2595, respectively. Conclusions: This study found that TGD men manifest relatively high adherence to screening mammography, whereas TGD women and individuals with gender dysphoria NMOT manifest low adherence. Future research should focus on improving breast cancer screening in these underserved populations.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 1530-1530
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

E

Elizabeth Jane Cathcart-Rake

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

V

Viengneesee Thao

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

J

Jennifer Le-Rademacher

Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

D

David A. Helfinstine

Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

K

Kathryn Jean Ruddy

Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

C

Celine Vachon

C

Caroline Davidge-Pitts

Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

E

Evelyn Carroll

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

J

Jennifer Ridgeway

Department of Health Care Delivery Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

C

Chrisandra Shufelt

General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

A

Amye Juliet Tevaarwerk

Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, MN

A

Aminah Jatoi

Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN