BREAKWATER: Primary analysis of first-line (1L) encorafenib + cetuximab (EC) + FOLFIRI in BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Abstract
13 Background: Leucovorin/5-FU in combination with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) are common chemotherapies used in 1L mCRC. In patients (pts) with BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, the Phase 3 portion of BREAKWATER (NCT04607421) demonstrated clinically meaningful and statistically significantly improved ORR by blinded independent central review (BICR), PFS by BICR, and OS with 1L EC + mFOLFOX6 vs chemotherapy ± bevacizumab (bev) (Kopetz Nat Med 2025; Elez N Engl J Med 2025). The safety lead-in portion of BREAKWATER previously showed that EC+FOLFIRI was tolerable with promising antitumor activity. The primary analysis results for EC+FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI ± bev (control) from BREAKWATER Cohort 3 are reported here. Methods: Eligible pts in Cohort 3 had untreated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to receive EC+FOLFIRI or control. The primary endpoint (EP) is ORR by BICR; key secondary EP is PFS by BICR; and other secondary EPs include OS, DOR, time to response (TTR), and safety. Results: In Cohort 3, 147 pts were randomized (EC+FOLFIRI, n=73; control, n=74). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were similar between arms (median age: 62 yrs; male: 46%; ECOG PS 0: 60%). At data cutoff (Mar 1, 2025), EC+FOLFIRI demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvement in confirmed ORR by BICR vs control (Table), meeting the primary EP. Responses observed with EC+FOLFIRI were rapid and durable. OS data were immature (median follow-up: 10.5 mo [EC+FOLFIRI] and 10.3 mo [control]) but suggested a potential survival benefit with EC+FOLFIRI vs control. Serious treatment-emergent adverse events (EC+FOLFIRI: n=71; control: n=68) occurred in 39.4% vs 36.8% of pts, respectively. The safety profile was consistent with that known for each agent. The addition of EC to FOLFIRI did not lead to substantial increases in FOLFIRI discontinuation (FOLFIRI [or bev] discontinuation: 9.9% vs 8.8%, respectively). Conclusions: BREAKWATER Cohort 3 demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant improved response rate that was rapid and durable with EC+FOLFIRI vs control in 1L BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC, with manageable toxicities and no new safety signals. These data support EC+FOLFIRI as a potential new standard of care in BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT04607421 . EC+FOLFIRI n=73 Controln=74 ORR, a % 64.4 39.2 Odds ratio (95% CI) P -value b 2.76 (1.42-5.35)0.001 Estimated medianresponse duration a,c (95% CI), mo NE (NE-NE) NE (7.0-NE) Pts with a response duration of ≥6 mo, a,c % 57.4 34.5 Median TTR a,c (range), weeks 6.9 (5.4-36.1) 7.1 (5.9-25.3) Median OS (95% CI), mo NE (NE-NE) NE (12.1-NE) OS hazard ratio (95% CI) 0.49 (0.24-1.03) a By BICR. b One-sided α=0.025. c In responders: n=47 and n=29, respectively. NE, not estimable.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (15)
Scott Kopetz
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Harpreet Singh Wasan
Hammersmith Hospital, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, London
Takayuki Yoshino
National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
Tae Won Kim
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Cathy Eng
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville
Eric Van Cutsem
University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
Fortunato Ciardiello
Jayesh Desai
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
Timothy S. Maughan
University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
Rona Yaeger
Xiaoxi Zhang
Pfizer, New York
Elena Beyzarov
Pfizer, Inc., New York, NY
Ave Mori
Pfizer S.R.L., Milan, Italy
Xiaosong Zhang
Josep Tabernero
Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus, Barcelona