Brain metastasis incidence with bireociclib in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: Pooled analysis of BRIGHT-1 and BRIGHT-2 study.

Q Qingyuan Zhang (Department of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China) J Jiayu Wang (Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Novel Functional Polymeric Materials, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Soft Material and New Energy, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University) Z Zhongsheng Tong T Tao Sun W Wei Li B Biyun Wang H Huiping Li H Huihui Li (CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication) Q Quchang Ouyang Y Yuee Teng J Jingfen Wang Y Ying Cheng (Institute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University) X Xinhong Wu J Jing Chen Z ZhenDong Chen Z Zhengqiu Zhu (Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China) X Xianghui Duan F Fan Yang L Li Wang (The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou China) B Binghe Xu (Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing)

Abstract

e13057 Background: Brain metastases (BM) significantly impact prognosis of patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC). Meta-analysis showed that hormone receptor positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic BC (MBC) had a pooled cumulative BM incidence of 15% with an incidence of 0.05 (95%CI: 0.03–0.08) per patient-year (Kuksis et al, Neuro Oncol 2021). Bireociclib, a novel CDK4/6 inhibitor, demonstrated favorable blood-brain barrier penetration and brain tissue distribution in preclinical study, and pronounced efficacy for HR+/HER2- advanced BC (ABC) in clinical study. Here we report the incidence of BM among pts with HR+/HER2- ABC after bireociclib treatment. Methods: We conducted a pooled analysis of HR+/HER2- ABC pts from BRIGHT-1 (NCT04539496) and BRIGHT-2 (NCT05077449) study. The cumulative incidence of BM was calculated using survival analysis, with incidence defined as events per total patient-years at risk. Results: A total of 697 ABC pts without BM at baseline were pooled for analysis. The baseline characteristics were showed in the table. In the pts receiving bireociclib containing regimens (n = 596), the pooled cumulative incidence of BM was 2.36% with an incidence of 0.0114 (95%CI: 0.0047, 0.0181) per patient-year. Median time from first dose or randomization to onset of BM was 7.36 months (n = 12). In heavily pretreated MBC pts (n = 264), the cumulative incidence of BM and the corresponding incidence per patient-year was 3.15% and 0.0144 (95%CI: 0.0030, 0.0259), respectively. Comparative analysis in the pts who failed prior first-line endocrine therapy revealed that cumulative incidence of BM and incidence per patient-year were 1.36% and 0.0070 (95%CI:0.0000, 0.0149) in bireociclib plus fulvestrant group (n = 297) and 8.16% and 0.0141 (95%CI: 0.0000, 0.0336) in placebo plus fulvestrant group (n = 101), respectively. Conclusions: This pooled analysis demonstrates numerically lower incidence of BM in HR+/HER2- MBC pts treated with bireociclib containing regimens, suggesting bireociclib's potential to reduce BM occurrence and inhibit intracranial lesions in ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT04539496 , NCT05077449 . BIRE treated pts (N=596) BIRE Monotherapy (N=264) BIRE+FUL (N=269) PBO+FUL (N=101) Follow-up time (Md, mo) 24.4 26.9 21.3 18.9 Age (Md, IQR, years) 54 (47, 62) 53 (46, 61) 54 (47, 63) 55 (48, 62) ECOG (0 vs 1, %) 31.2 vs 68.8 28.0 vs 72.0 36.4 vs 63.6 44.6 vs 55.4 HR status (ER+PR+ vs ER+PR-, %) 79.5 vs 18.6 77.3 vs 18.9 79.6 vs 20.1 71.3 vs 28.7 Ki-67 (Md, IQR, %) 30 (15, 40) 30 (15, 40) 30 (15, 40) 25 (10, 40) Visceral mets (liver vs lung, %) 38.4 vs 47.0 51.5 vs 52.3 32.0 vs 41.3 36.6 vs 44.6 Disease setting (locoregional vs metastatic, %) 3.0 vs 97.0 0 vs 100 5.6 vs 94.4 4.0 vs 96.0 Prior ET for metastatic disease (Number of regimens ≤1 vs >1, %) 66.6 vs 33.4 25.0 vs 75.0 99.6 vs 0.4 100 vs 0 Prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease (Number of regimens ≤1 vs >1, %) 79.7 vs 20.3 54.5 vs 45.5 100 vs 0 100 vs 0

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

Q

Qingyuan Zhang

Department of Oncology, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, China

J

Jiayu Wang

Jiangsu Engineering Laboratory of Novel Functional Polymeric Materials, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Advanced Negative Carbon Technologies, Suzhou Key Laboratory of Soft Material and New Energy, College of Chemistry, Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University

Z

Zhongsheng Tong

T

Tao Sun

W

Wei Li

B

Biyun Wang

H

Huiping Li

H

Huihui Li

CAS Key Laboratory of Nanosystem and Hierarchical Fabrication

Q

Quchang Ouyang

Y

Yuee Teng

J

Jingfen Wang

Y

Ying Cheng

Institute of Biomedical Research, Yunnan University

X

Xinhong Wu

J

Jing Chen

Z

ZhenDong Chen

Z

Zhengqiu Zhu

Department of Medical Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China

X

Xianghui Duan

F

Fan Yang

L

Li Wang

The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Henan Cancer Hospital Zhengzhou China

B

Binghe Xu

Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing