Blunted CD40-responsive enhancer activation in <i>CREBBP</i>-mutant lymphomas can be restored by enforced CD4 T-cell engagement
Abstract
Abstract The CREBBP lysine acetyltransferase (KAT) is frequently mutated in follicular lymphoma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and has been studied using gene knockout in murine and human cells. However, most CREBBP mutations encode amino acid substitutions within the catalytic KAT domain (CREBBP KAT-PM) that retain an inactive protein and have not been extensively characterized. Using CRISPR gene editing and extensive epigenomic characterization of lymphoma cell lines, we found that CREBBP KAT-PM lead to unloading of CREBBP from chromatin, loss of enhancer acetylation, and prevention of EP300 compensation. These enhancers were enriched for those that are dynamically loaded by CREBBP in the normal centroblast-to-centrocyte transition in the germinal center, including enhancers activated in response to CD40 signaling, leading to blunted molecular response to CD40 ligand in lymphoma cells. We provide evidence that CREBBP KAT-PM inhibits EP300 function by binding limiting quantities nuclear transcription factor (TF), thereby preventing its compensatory activity. This effect can be experimentally overcome by expressing saturating quantities of TF or biologically attenuated by strong stimulation of CD40 signaling that increases nuclear TF abundance. Importantly, epigenetic responses to CD40 signaling can be induced by enforcing CD4 T-cell engagement using a bispecific antibody, leading to CD40-dependent restoration of antigen presentation machinery in CREBBP KAT-PM cells and cell death. Therefore, we provide a mechanistic basis for enhancer deregulation by CREBBP KAT-PM and highlight enforced CD4 T-cell engagement as a potential approach for overcoming these effects.
Article Details
Authors (21)
Haopeng Yang
Wenchao Zhang
Vida Ravanmehr
Guiling Cui
Kevin Bowman
Ruidong Chen
Jared M. Henderson
1Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Shyanne Lockman
1Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Estela Rojas
1Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Ashley Wilson
New York Genome Center
Sydney Parsons
1Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Ariel Mechaly
Leslie Regad
Ahmed Haouz
Christopher R. Flowers
Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine
Sattva Neelapu
4The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, Houston, United States
Loretta Nastoupil
10Southwest Oncology, Durango, United States
R. Eric Davis
1Department of Lymphoma and Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Qing Deng
Fernando Rodrigues-Lima
2Unité de Biologie Fonctionnelle et Adaptative, Université Paris Cité, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
Michael R. Green