Biological and therapeutic impact of tumor mutational burden in microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
Abstract
272 Background: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is linked to hypermutability and response to ICI(s), especially in colorectal cancer. The predictive impact of tumor mutational burden (TMB) in ICI-treated MSI/dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer remains controversial, with some studies suggesting low TMB as a potential biomarker of resistance to ICI(s). We aimed to investigate the biological relevance of TMB in MSI/dMMR mCRC and its impact on survival outcomes in ICI(s)-treated patients (pts). Methods: MSI/dMMR mCRC pts treated with ICI(s) from the NIPICOL trial (NCT03350126) and the immunoMSI prospective monocentric cohort with available data from whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNA-sequencing (RNA-seq) were included. All cases were centrally assessed for MSI and dMMR status. TMB was calculated as described (Dupain et al., BMC, 2024). The search for a cutpoint able to optimize the difference in survival between 2 groups of patients with low and high-TMB was applied. The main endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) by iRECIST criteria. The cohort (NIPICOL, immunoMSI) was included as a covariate in the analysis of differential gene expression and pathway enrichment, with various tumor mutational burden (TMB) thresholds evaluated, specifically 10 and 30 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb). Results: A total of 99 pts were analyzed, with 4 (4%) excluded after central MSI/dMMR status review. Of these, 52 received anti-PD1 plus anti-CTLA4 therapy, while 43 received anti-PD1 alone. Median follow-up was 25 months. Median TMB was 51.8 mut/Mb (IQR: 35.9-74.9). TMB was not predictive of patient PFS, whatever the TMB threshold applied, including cutpoints already reported in the literature, the 2-year PFS rates being 80% versus 80% for TMB ≤ 10 and > 10 mut/Mb, and 79% versus 82% for TMB ≤ 30 and > 30 mut/Mb, respectively. Multivariate analysis including treatment type confirmed no association between TMB and PFS (HR 1.00, 95% CI [0.97–1.04]). TMB levels were not linked with specific signalling pathways related to immune checkpoints or antigen presentation as evaluated by RNA-seq with Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) at a TMB threshold of 10 or 30 mut/Mb. However pathways involved in cell proliferation (e.g., “cell cycle”, “DNA replication”) were increased in TMB high (adjusted p-value <0.05). RNA-seq signature quantification and deconvolution analysis revealed similar cell populations (e.g., fibroblasts, B cells, T cells) between high and low TMB groups at a TMB threshold of 10 and 30 mut/Mb. Conclusions: TMB has no survival impact for patients with ICI(s)-treated dMMR/MSI mCRC and does not discriminate two biologically distinct subpopulations. Other biomarkers should be developed for personalized medicine amongst these patients.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Sarah Blanchet Deverly
Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, Paris, France
Balthazar Raffy
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Paris, France
Toky Ratovomanana
Msinsight, Paris, France
Remy Nicolle
Paula Nay
Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, University of Paris, Paris, France
Thierry André
Alex Duval
Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938 and SIRIC CURAMUS, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine, Equipe Instabilité des Microsatellites et Cancer, Equipe Labellisée par la Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Paris, France
Romain Cohen
Sorbonne University; Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, AP-HP, INSERM 938, SIRIC CURAMUS, Paris, France