Biodiversity conservation requires consideration of different life history stages
Abstract
Amid the biodiversity crisis, functional diversity, which is critical for ecosystem stability and conservation planning—faces challenges due to species’ complex life cycles. As the majority of animals, species with complex life histories may have distinct traits and ecological functions at different stages. Using all 557 Chinese anurans, we tested whether adult-based conservation protects entire taxa by analyzing functional trait diversity across life stages. We compiled adult and tadpole traits, mapped spatial diversity patterns, identified hotspots, recognized conservation priority species based on traits at different stages, and tested whether integrating information from different life history stages can effectively conserve functional diversity. Results showed functional diversity hotspots of adults and tadpoles are different. Species’ functional uniqueness between stages were not correlated, with only 18.8% species overlapped in conservation priority lists. Meanwhile, conservation strategies prioritizing species based on adult traits failed to protect tadpole functional diversity. The extent of functional diversity covered by these species was similar to that of randomly chosen species. These findings reject the hypothesis that conservation strategies made based on information of adults can adequately protect whole taxa. Nevertheless, when information from both stages is integrated, the conservation effectiveness has significantly improved. Thus, comprehensive biodiversity protection requires integrated assessments of all stages.
Article Details
Journal Info
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
National Academy of Sciences
Authors (8)
Yan-Fang Song
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Innovation Center for Biotechnology in Breeding, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University
Xiao-Long Liu
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Innovation Center for Biotechnology in Breeding, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University
Jia-Jia Liu
Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University
Qing-Qing Li
Key Laboratory for Conserving Wildlife with Small Populations in Yunnan, Forestry College, Southwest Forestry University
Xian-Qi Li
Key Laboratory for Conserving Wildlife with Small Populations in Yunnan, Forestry College, Southwest Forestry University
Wen-Zhu Lu
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Innovation Center for Biotechnology in Breeding, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University
Wei-Wei Zhou
State Key Laboratory of Grassland Agro-Ecosystems, and College of Ecology, Lanzhou University
Zhi-Yong Yuan
Key Laboratory of Freshwater Fish Reproduction and Development (Ministry of Education), Integrative Science Center of Germplasm Creation in Western China (Chongqing) Science City, Chongqing Innovation Center for Biotechnology in Breeding, School of Life Sciences, Southwest University