Biochar in the circular bionutrient economy

J Johannes Lehmann E Edmundo Barrios (Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations) M Mariana Devault (Crop Nutrition, Research and Development Department, Agro Innovation International, Groupe Roullier) L Lucinda Li R Rebecca Nelson (Department of Global Development, Cornell University) J Johan Six (Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, ETH Zurich) J John Trimmer (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University)

Abstract

The circular bionutrient economy is defined here as the circular economy of nutrients in managed organic residues. Here, we posit that biochar technology can stimulate the circular bionutrient economy by meeting the following three requirements: 1) nutrients are captured in a dry form, increasing market value and lowering transportation cost; 2) individual nutrients can be captured separately and combined as needed for particular plants and soils; 3) all pathogens and most pollutants can be removed with the notable exception of heavy metals. Pyrolysis and associated moisture removal enabled by the energy released during pyrolysis decreases weight of solid excreta by 85 to 90% and volume by 74 to 90%. This will lower storage and transport costs allowing redistribution of nutrients from production to processing and consumption of food. Incorporating liquid organic residues into nutrient recovery processes is crucial to the circular bionutrient economy. For example, N fertilizer from human feces would only generate about 2% (2.0 to 2.4 Tg N y −1 ) of current global N application, whereas including urine could increase this fraction to 16 to 17% (15.7 to 16.9 Tg N y −1 ). Nutrient acquisition by plants can be increased by biochar through nutrient retention and pH buffering in soil. We posit that leveraging biochar to close the nutrient circle requires public–private partnerships in forms of a community of practice and green alliances. These must develop a marketable product that incentivizes private investment. Such products may only be cost competitive with established fertilizer products by internalizing external environmental costs possibly through market mechanisms including but not limited to carbon credits.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 33
Published August 19, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (7)

J

Johannes Lehmann

E

Edmundo Barrios

Plant Production and Protection Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

M

Mariana Devault

Crop Nutrition, Research and Development Department, Agro Innovation International, Groupe Roullier

L

Lucinda Li

R

Rebecca Nelson

Department of Global Development, Cornell University

J

Johan Six

Department of Environmental Systems Sciences, ETH Zurich

J

John Trimmer

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Syracuse University