Benchmarking survival outcomes of quemliclustat in first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Insights from ARC-8 and implications for PRISM-1.
Abstract
e16396 Background: Outcomes in first-line metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) remain poor, with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) yielding median overall survival (OS) < 11 months in contemporary trials. ARC-8, a phase I/Ib randomized study, evaluated the CD73 inhibitor quemliclustat combined with GnP ± the PD-1 inhibitor zimberelimab and demonstrated encouraging survival outcomes. We conducted a trial-in-context benchmark analysis to assess whether the ARC-8 OS signal exceeds contemporary first-line expectations after accounting for cross-trial differences. Methods: Published ARC-8 efficacy data were synthesized for treatment-naïve mPDAC patients receiving 100-mg quemliclustat-based regimens (quemliclustat + GnP or quemliclustat + zimberelimab + GnP). As ARC-8 lacked a control arm, a matched synthetic control arm (SCA) was derived from historical GnP-treated patients using key baseline characteristics. Contemporary phase III GnP benchmarks from MPACT and NAPOLI-3 control arms were included. Cross-trial differences in OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall response rate (ORR) were qualitatively assessed for potential directional bias. Results: Across benchmarking approaches, pooled ARC-8 quemliclustat-based regimens were associated with a median OS of 15.7 months, exceeding contemporary first-line GnP benchmarks. In the matched SCA comparison, OS remained improved (HR for death 0.63), despite baseline characteristics expected to bias against ARC-8. PFS and ORR were broadly similar to GnP benchmarks. No new safety signals or toxicity were observed. Conclusions: In a trial-in-context benchmark analysis, quemliclustat-based regimens in ARC-8 were associated with a consistent OS advantage compared with contemporary GnP benchmarks despite similar PFS and ORR, suggesting a clinically meaningful survival signal and supporting the clinical and biologic rationale for the ongoing phase III PRISM-1 trial. OS, PFS and ORR for ARC-8 Quemliclustat regimens v/s GnP benchmarks. Population/ comparator Median OS, months (95% CI) 12-moOS (%) Median PFS, months ORR (%) ARC-8 Q100 ± Z + GnP (n=122) 15.7 (12.7 63 6.3 (5.4-7.7) 39 Synthetic control GnP (matched, n=515) 9.5 (8.8-10.5) 39.7 5.6 37.3 Contemporary phase III GnP benchmarks 9.2 (8.3-10.6) 40 5.6 (5.3-5.8) 36 Q=quemliclustat; Z=zimberelimab; GnP=gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (8)
Yuktha Sridhar
J.J.M Medical College, Davangere, India
Daisha Rathod
Osmania medical college, Hyderabad, India
Himanshu Khangwal
North Delhi Municipal Corporation Medical College, Hindu Rao Hospital, Delhi, India
Neha Pillai Vinod
SRM Medical College and Research Center, Chennai, India
Purvy Manhari Ravula
Mamata Medical College, Khammam, India
Vaishnavi Kandukuri
Harnett Health Systems Inc., Dunn, NC
Smruti Karale
Government Medical College Kolhapur, Maharashtra, Maharashtra, India
Dushyant Singh Dahiya
The University of Kansas School of Medicine, Overland Park