Barriers to germline genetic testing in advanced prostate cancer: Survey results from the Germline Genetics Working Group of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC).
Abstract
e17073 Background: The NCCN began recommending germline genetic testing for individuals with high-risk or advanced prostate cancer (PCa) in 2017. In 2019, our survey of physicians within the PCCTC showed that the adoption of germline testing was not widespread: 62% of physicians considered testing for all men with metastatic PCa (mPCa) and 12% considered testing for men with high risk localized PCa. In 2024 we conducted a follow up survey to evaluate changes in perception of germline testing uptake, clinic workflow and barriers. Methods: A 22-item survey was distributed via email to physicians associated with the PCCTC and was open for responses between 5/24/2024 and 7/11/2024. We collected data on physicians’ personal practices around germline testing in PCa, perceived barriers to testing and uptake of the testing. Results: 379 physicians received the germline genetic testing current practice survey, and 90 (24%) completed the survey. A total of 40% (36/90) of participating physicians reported that they refer eligible patients to a separate department for genetic testing and counseling, and more than half (70%) reported taking personal responsibility for some or all genetic education and testing of their eligible patients. 21% (19/90) reported obtaining genetic testing results through patient enrollment in a research study. When asked for a best estimate of all PCa patients who meet current NCCN criteria for germline testing who have completed testing, 28% (22/80) of physicians responded with a range of 51-75%. The remaining responses of participating physicians are split with 26% estimating >76%, 25% estimating 26-50%, and 21% estimating <26% of patients who qualify receive germline genetic testing. The majority of responders reported considering some mPCa patients for germline genetic testing: 81% reported considering all mPCa patients; 34% considered testing mPCa patients with a family history, and 38% considered testing only those for whom results would influence treatment (FDA-approved targeted therapy or trial candidates). More than half of the participating physicians (54%) considered germline genetic testing for some PCa patients with high-risk localized PCa. Based on participant responses and free text comments, cited barriers in streamlining genetic testing were: clinical workflow, time and space availability, access to genetic counselors, out of pocket cost, insurance coverage, access to resources for provider/patient education, among others. Conclusions: Physician uptake of germline genetic testing has increased since our initial survey in 2019. A greater percentage of participating physicians report ordering germline testing in their clinic and providing pre- and post-test counseling. Clinic flow and access to genetic counselors remain prominent barriers.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Alexandra Sokolova
Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
Channing Judith Paller
Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota
Pedro C. Barata
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
Jacob E Berchuck
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
Burcu Darst
Fred Hutchison Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
Veda N. Giri
Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
Rossella Graffeo
IOSI Switzerland, Lugano, Switzerland
Feighanne Hathaway
University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
Daniel H. Kwon
Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
Stacy Loeb
NYU Langone Health, New York, NY
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Zachery R. Reichert
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Maria J. A. Ribeiro
Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA
Ashwin Sachdeva
Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Christie NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
Walter Stadler
City of Hope Chicago, Chicago, IL
Mark N Stein
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Mary-Ellen Taplin
Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
Emily Steinberger Weg
University of Washington, Seattle, WA
Heather H. Cheng
University of Washington, Seattle, WA