Avelumab + sacituzumab govitecan (Ave + SG) vs avelumab monotherapy (Ave mono) as first-line (1L) maintenance treatment for advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC): Updated subgroup analyses of JAVELIN Bladder Medley based on metastatic sites.

P Petros Grivas (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA) B Begoña P. Valderrama (Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain) M Marinos Tsiatas (Athens Medical Center, Marousi, Greece) P Peter Mu-Hsin Chang (Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and Institute of Biopharmaceutical Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan) M Miso Kim (Department of Mechanical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea) L Lorenzo Antonuzzo (Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy) S Sang Joon Shin (Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul, South Korea) G Georgios Gakis (Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany) N Normand Blais (Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada) S Se Hyun Kim J José Ángel Arranz Arija H Harvey Yu-Li Su (Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan) F Flora Zagouri (Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece) M Marco Maruzzo (Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)–IRCCS, Padua, Italy) A Astrid Schneider (The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) K Karin Tyroller (EMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA) J Jason Hoffman (EMD Serono, Billerica, MA) N Natalia Jacob (The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) J Jeannie Hoffman-Censits (From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...)

Abstract

4568 Background: Ave 1L maintenance is a recommended treatment option for patients (pts) with aUC without progression after 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). In the JAVELIN Bladder Medley phase 2 trial (NCT05327530), 1L maintenance with Ave + SG (Trop-2–directed antibody-drug conjugate) improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs Ave mono (primary endpoint). In pts with aUC, presence of visceral metastases (including liver or lung) is associated with poorer prognosis. We report updated subgroup analyses from the primary analysis of JAVELIN Bladder Medley based on metastatic site. Methods: Pts with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic UC without progression after 4-6 cycles of 1L PBC were randomized 2:1 to receive Ave + SG or Ave mono, stratified by presence of visceral metastases at start of 1L PBC. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed PFS (measured from randomization) and safety; overall survival (OS) was a secondary endpoint. For visceral and nonvisceral subgroups, PFS and OS data in the Ave mono arm were extended per protocol using propensity score–weighted data from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial; extended data were not available for other subgroups. Results: At the start of 1L PBC, of 74 and 37 pts in the Ave + SG and Ave mono arms, respectively, 37 (50.0%) and 19 (51.4%) had visceral metastases, 20 (27.0%) and 11 (29.7%) had lung metastases, 17 (23.0%) and 7 (18.9%) had liver metastases, 17 (23.0%) and 11 (29.7%) had bone metastases, and 26 (35.1%) and 11 (29.7%) had lymph node–only disease. At data cutoff (Apr 28, 2025), in the Ave + SG and Ave mono arms, respectively, median follow-up for PFS was 15.7 and 25.1 mo. Across all subgroups, PFS was prolonged with Ave + SG vs Ave mono (Table); OS analyses were immature. In the Ave + SG and Ave mono arms, respectively, grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 72.2% and 5.6% of pts with visceral metastases, 57.9% and 0% of pts with lung metastases, 82.4% and 0% of pts with liver metastases, 82.4% and 0% of pts with bone metastases, 70.3% and 5.6% of pts with nonvisceral metastases, and 76.9% and 9.1% of pts with lymph node–only metastases. Conclusions: In the primary analysis of JAVELIN Bladder Medley, Ave + SG as 1L maintenance improved PFS vs Ave mono, irrespective of metastatic site. Clinical trial information: NCT05327530 . PFS, median (95% CI), mo Ave + SG Ave mono HR (95% CI) Site of metastases at start of 1L PBC Visceral* 9.03 (5.62-13.80) 2.20 (1.91-3.71) 0.49 (0.28-0.84) Nonvisceral 14.69 (7.43-NE) 7.33 (4.21-11.10) 0.61 (0.33-1.13) Lung 8.77 (4.17-9.46) 1.81 (0.07-9.26) 0.43 (0.17-1.09) Liver 8.77 (5.55-9.36) 2.69 (1.91-NE) 0.48 (0.17-1.32) Bone 9.26 (5.49-17.64) 2.33 (0.07-5.45) 0.40 (0.16-0.99) Lymph node only 14.00 (7.43-NE) 7.59 (1.87-NE) 0.65 (0.26-1.66) *Pts could have ≥1 site of visceral metastases.HR, hazard ratio; NE, not estimable.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 4568-4568
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

P

Petros Grivas

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine University of Washington Seattle Washington USA

B

Begoña P. Valderrama

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain

M

Marinos Tsiatas

Athens Medical Center, Marousi, Greece

P

Peter Mu-Hsin Chang

Taipei Veterans General Hospital, and Institute of Biopharmaceutical Science, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan

M

Miso Kim

Department of Mechanical Engineering Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) Daejeon 34141 Republic of Korea

L

Lorenzo Antonuzzo

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy

S

Sang Joon Shin

Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea, Seoul, South Korea

G

Georgios Gakis

Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

N

Normand Blais

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada

S

Se Hyun Kim

J

José Ángel Arranz Arija

H

Harvey Yu-Li Su

Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

F

Flora Zagouri

Alexandra Hospital, Athens, Greece

M

Marco Maruzzo

Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV)–IRCCS, Padua, Italy

A

Astrid Schneider

The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

K

Karin Tyroller

EMD Serono, Inc., Billerica, MA

J

Jason Hoffman

EMD Serono, Billerica, MA

N

Natalia Jacob

The Healthcare Business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

J

Jeannie Hoffman-Censits

From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...