Avapritinib achieves deep and durable symptom control with a well-tolerated safety profile in ism: Long-term outcomes from pioneer
Abstract
Abstract Introduction: Indolent systemic mastocytosis (ISM) is a clonal mast cell disease driven by the KIT D816V mutation in ~95% of cases and is associated with symptoms of mast cell activation and tissue infiltration. It can cause chronic, debilitating symptoms − including life-threatening anaphylaxis and impaired bone health. While historically most patients have relied on symptom-directed best supportive care (BSC) therapies, avapritinib is used as a new standard of care targeting KIT D816V, the primary driver for SM. Avapritinib is an oral, potent, selective KIT D816V inhibitor, and the first and only approved targeted therapy for adult patients with ISM in the USA and the EU. Approval was based on results from the phase 2 PIONEER trial. Here, we present the findings from ~3.5-year long-term follow-up. Methods: Adults with centrally confirmed ISM and uncontrolled moderate-to-severe symptoms who completed the randomized dose-finding (Part 1), or randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled (Part 2) portions of PIONEER (NCT03731260) rolled over to the open-label, long-term extension (Part 3). This cumulative analysis includes patients who initiated avapritinib at the recommended dose of 25 mg once daily (QD) in either Parts 1, 2, or 3. All patients received BSC. Per investigator discretion and based on disease burden, dose titration up to 50 mg QD of avapritinib was permitted in Part 3. Long-term efficacy was assessed by measuring changes in symptoms and QoL, using the ISM-Symptom Assessment Form (ISM-SAF; ©2018 Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi Company) and the Mastocytosis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (MC-QoL). Safety was also assessed. Results: Overall, 226 patients initiated avapritinib 25mg QD across Parts 1, 2, and 3. This longer-term analysis is inclusive of 65 patients who dose titrated from 25 mg to 50 mg QD in Part 3. Median (range) treatment duration was 40.0 months (0.7‒67.2) as of February 21, 2025. Longer-term efficacy data with ~3.5 years of follow-up demonstrated sustained disease-related symptom improvements. The mean change (standard deviation [SD]) in total symptom score (TSS, per ISM-SAF), was −19.80 (19.81) at Week 144 (Month 33) and −20.43 (20.57) at Week 168 (Month 39) from a baseline of 48.08 (19.47). Additionally, avapritinib-treated patients demonstrated durable improvement in their most severe symptoms (mean change [SD] from baseline of −3.35 [3.02] at Month 33 and −3.47 [3.19] at Month 39) per ISM-SAF. Sustained responses were observed across all individual symptom domains (0–30) with mean changes (SD) at Month 33 and Month 39 of −3.77 (5.52) and −3.84 (6.05) for the gastrointestinal domain, −8.21 (7.70) and −8.20 (7.85) for the skin domain, and −4.66 (6.24) and −4.87 (6.51) for the neurocognitive domain. The mean percent change (SD) in MC-QoL was −34.67 (40.16) at Month 33 and −40.72 (33.24) at Month 39 from a baseline of 54.24 (18.32). Treatment with avapritinib was well tolerated, and its safety profile was similar to the previously reported placebo-controlled portion. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were Grades 1–2, and 7% of patients experienced Grade ≥3 TRAEs of which diarrhea, neutrophil count decrease, and weight increase occurred in >1 patient. No Grade ≥3 TRAEs of increase in transaminases were observed. Edema (peripheral and periorbital), the most frequently reported TRAE, was mostly Grade 1 and occurred most frequently during the first 3–4 months of treatment. Three patients (1%) experienced serious adverse events assessed as treatment related. However, none led to treatment discontinuation and no trends were observed. After approximately 3.5 years of follow-up, low rates of treatment discontinuations (n=7, 3%) due to TRAEs were observed. Conclusion: Longer follow-up of patients with ISM treated on the PIONEER trial, including some on avapritinib for up to 5 years, demonstrates that prolonged avapritinib therapy continues to be effective and well tolerated. Additional prospective analyses will be needed to determine effects of selective KIT D816V-inhibition on anaphylaxis. These data support a favorable benefit-risk profile of avapritinib as a chronic treatment for adult patients with ISM.
Article Details
Authors (36)
Tsewang Tashi
4Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, United States
Hanneke Oude Elberink
2Department of Allergology, Groningen Research Institute Asthma and COPD, University Medical Center, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
Cem Akin
7University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, United States
Mariana Castells
1Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States
Jens Panse
9Department of Hematology, Oncology, Hemostaseology and Stem Cell Transplantation, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University & Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Aachen, Germany
Deepti Radia
4Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
Frank Siebenhaar
9Institute of Allergology, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Cristina Bulai Livideanu
6Département de dermatologie, CEREMAST CHU de Toulouse, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
Karin Hartmann
6Division of Allergy, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
Sigurd Broesby-Olsen
14Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
Tracy George
2ARUP Laboratories, Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, United States
Vito Sabato
5Department of Immunology, Allergology and Rheumatology, University of Antwerp, and Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium
Paul van Daele
18Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Immunology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
Sonia Cerquozzi
19Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Arthur Child Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada
Ingunn Dybedal
20Department of Hematology and Pharmacology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Joseph Jurcic
1Columbia University Irving Medical Center, Division of Hematology/Oncology, New York, United States
Stéphane Barete
22Unit of Dermatology Reference Centre for Mastocytosis (CEREMAST) AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
Andreas Reiter
Thanai Pongdee
24Division of Allergic Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States
Ruchi Desai
12Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, United States
Philippe Schafhausen
3University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Oncology and Hematology, Hamburg, Germany
Celalettin Ustun
9Rush University, Chicago, United States
Prithviraj Bose
5University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, United States
Peter Vadas
29Department of Medicine, Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Massimo Triggiani
Patrizia Bonadonna
31USD di Allergologia, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
Daniel Deangelo
2Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, United States
Lindsay Rein
10Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States
Pankit Vachhani
25University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer Center, Birmingham, United States
Ilda Bidollari
6Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi company, Cambridge, United States
Hui-Min Lin
6Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi company, Cambridge, United States
Janet Hong
13Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi company, Cambridge, United States
Benjamin Lampson
13Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi company, Cambridge, United States
Ashley Doyle
13Blueprint Medicines, a Sanofi company, Cambridge, United States
Iván Álvarez-Twose
3Red Española de Mastocitosis, Toledo, Spain
Jason Gotlib
15Division of Hematology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA