Atypical hemolytic uremic Syndrome Triggered by malignancy and drug exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

M Moazzam Shahzad (10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States) F Farooq Ashraf (3Gujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala, Pakistan) S Sayyam Razzaq (3Poonch Medical College, Rawalakot, Pakistan) H Hafiz Muhammad Hannan Javed (4TidalHealth Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury, United States) M Muhammad Shaheer Mannan (8Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States) M Muhammaf Fareed Khalid (4Danbury Hospital, Danbury, United States) F Fatima Sial (King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan) A Atif Butt (8East Carolina University, Greenville, United States) A Anas Al-sadi (2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States) I Ibrahim Khamees (2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States) S Sarmad Zaman Warraich (3Medical University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain) M Michael Jaglal (5H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States) M Muhammad Umair Mushtaq (1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS)

Abstract

Abstract Background Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare thrombotic microangiopathy driven by complement dysregulation. Malignancy and drugs are known triggers but remain underreported and poorly characterized. This study aims to explore the malignancy and drugs induced aHUS.  Methods Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted on PubMed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov, and 44 original studies reporting aHUS secondary to malignancy or drug exposure were included. Pooled proportions with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using the DerSimonian–Laird estimator and analyzed with the 'meta’ package in R (version 4.16-2). Demographic, clinical, genetic, and treatment-related data were extracted and analyzed descriptively. Results A total of 168 patients from 44 studies were included. The median age was 45 years (1–86); and 68% were female. Tacrolimus was the most reported drug trigger (n=6)followed by gemcitabine (n=5), vincristine (n=5), bevacizumab (n=3), carfilzomib (n=3), 6-mercaptopurine (n=2), methotrexate (n=2), and mitomycin (n=2). Aflibercept, bactrim, bleomycin, capecitabine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, dasatinib, deferasirox, dinutuximab, estarylla, ketoprofen, L-asparaginase, modakafusp alfa, PEG-asparaginase, sunitinib, synthetic psychoactive drugs, tamoxifen, and topotecan were reported as potential triggers for aHUS in one patient each. B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia (B-ALL) (n = 10), followed by multiple myeloma (n = 2) and Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 1) were the most common triggering hematologic malignancies whileneuroblastoma (n = 4), ovarian cancer (n = 3), breast cancer (n = 3), and cholangiocarcinoma (n = 2) were the most common solid malignancies. Fibrolamellar hepatocellular carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, urothelial cancer, prostate cancer, metastatic mullerian adenocarcinoma, large granular lymphocytic leukemia, and renal cell carcinoma were reported in one patient each. All patients were presented with anemia and thrombocytopenia. The pooled rates for patients who had acute kidney injury (AKI) and who required hemodialysis were 100% (95% CI, 0.993-1.00, p = 1.00, I2 = 0%) and 76% (95% CI, 0.642-0.868, p < 0.01, I2 = 55%), respectively. The pooled rates for low ADAMTS13 activity and low complement levels were 37% (95% CI, 0.181-0.589, p = 0.06, I2 = 32%) and 47% (95% CI, 0.266-0.682, p = 0.12, I2 = 28%), respectively. The pooled rate of treatment with eculizumab was 74% (95% CI, 0.629-0.842, p < 0.01, I2 = 72%), and the pooled rate of renal recovery was 65% (95% CI, 0.525-0.761, p < 0.01, I2 = 55%).  Conclusion Tacrolimus, B-ALL, and neuroblastoma are frequently reported aHUS triggers, along with a plethora of chemotherapeutic drugs and malignancies. AKI and hematological abnormalities in these patients should prompt an emergent work-up and treatment. Current evidence is primarily derived from case reports, so prospective trials are necessary to establish the incidence, associations, triggers, and outcomes to devise preventive strategies.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 2689-2689
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (13)

M

Moazzam Shahzad

10H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States

F

Farooq Ashraf

3Gujranwala Medical College, Gujranwala, Pakistan

S

Sayyam Razzaq

3Poonch Medical College, Rawalakot, Pakistan

H

Hafiz Muhammad Hannan Javed

4TidalHealth Peninsula Regional Medical Center, Salisbury, United States

M

Muhammad Shaheer Mannan

8Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, United States

M

Muhammaf Fareed Khalid

4Danbury Hospital, Danbury, United States

F

Fatima Sial

King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan

A

Atif Butt

8East Carolina University, Greenville, United States

A

Anas Al-sadi

2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States

I

Ibrahim Khamees

2University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, United States

S

Sarmad Zaman Warraich

3Medical University of Lleida, Lleida, Spain

M

Michael Jaglal

5H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, United States

M

Muhammad Umair Mushtaq

1Division of Hematologic Malignancies and Cellular Therapeutics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS