Asymmetric Oxygen Bridges: A Unified Design Framework for Enhanced Catalysis

X Xurui Zhang (MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering) T Tailei Hou (MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering) B Bohan Wu (MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering) X Xiaoting He (Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Molecular Materials and High‐throughput Manufacturing MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China) X Xinyuan Li D Dingsheng Wang (Department of Chemistry) J Jiatao Zhang (MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The asymmetric oxygen bridges (AOBs), composed of asymmetric Metal 1 ‐Oxygen‐Metal 2 (M 1 ‐O‐M 2 ) with intrinsic electronic and geometric asymmetry, have gained significant attention in heterogeneous catalysis. The intrinsic asymmetric coordination induces unique and controllable interfacial charge polarization, which have recently inspired novel design concepts to achieve improved structure‐activity relationships. However, fully exploiting their potential requires a systematic framework to unify design principles. This review systematically presents the unique characteristics of AOBs originated by the different valence states, ionic radius and electronegativities of oxygen bridged metal sites. By analyzing the structure‐activity relationship between atomic‐scale charge polarization and lattice strain with macroscopic functionality, the enhancing mechanisms of AOBs from categories including heteronuclear AOBs, homonuclear hetero‐valent AOBs, heteroatoms modified AOBs and dynamically tunable AOBs is illustrated. These insights will provide new opportunities for understanding of catalytic mechanisms, the design of highly efficient catalysts and the development of more efficient energy conversion technologies.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 38, Issue 40
Published July 01, 2026
ISSN 0935-9648
Publisher Unknown Publisher

Journal Info

Advanced Materials

Unknown Publisher

ISSN: 0935-9648 Physical Sciences

Authors (7)

X

Xurui Zhang

MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering

T

Tailei Hou

MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering

B

Bohan Wu

MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering

X

Xiaoting He

Beijing Key Laboratory of Intelligent Molecular Materials and High‐throughput Manufacturing MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology Beijing China

X

Xinyuan Li

D

Dingsheng Wang

Department of Chemistry

J

Jiatao Zhang

MOE Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, MIIT Key Laboratory of Medical Molecule Science and Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, School of Materials Science & Engineering