Associations between neighborhood disadvantage, cannabis use, and patient-reported outcomes among patients with cancer.

B Brittney Greene (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) S Shilpa Ghosh (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) C Craig Colder (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY) S Salimah H. Meghani (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) B Brooke Worster (Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA) R Rebecca Ashare (University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY)

Abstract

e13501 Background: Cannabis use is proliferating among oncological populations. However, research is limited on whether cannabis use, including route and source, is associated with neighborhood disadvantage and may elucidate differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This analysis evaluates the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and cannabis source and route, and their association with PROs. Methods: Analyses included 106 patients with cancer from varying levels of neighborhood disadvantage. Logistic regressions tested the association of neighborhood disadvantage with cannabis source (i.e., regulated vs. unregulated) and route (i.e., inhaled vs. consumed/other formulations). Multilevel regressions tested the association of neighborhood disadvantage with PROs (e.g., anxiety, depression, sleep quality, pain, quality of life) and moderation by cannabis source and route. Results: Controlling for covariates, neighborhood disadvantage did not uniquely predict cannabis source or route ( p ’s > .05) or PROs ( p ’s > .05). Conversely, household income predicted pain interference and severity, quality of life, and depression, indicating that lower household income was associated with worse outcomes ( p ’s < .05). Multilevel analyses including cannabis route as a moderator revealed that cannabis route significantly moderated the relationship between neighborhood disadvantage and anxiety ( b = 0.09, 95%CI [-0.01,0.2], p = .03). Inhaled formulations (vs consumed/other formulations) were associated with high levels of anxiety for patients from moderately disadvantaged neighborhoods. Conversely, inhaled formulations were associated with lower levels of anxiety for patients from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods. Conclusions: Although the composite index of neighborhood disadvantage was not associated with cannabis use or PROs, our data suggest that income and cannabis route may be key factors associated with health disparities among patients with cancer.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (6)

B

Brittney Greene

University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

S

Shilpa Ghosh

University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

C

Craig Colder

University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY

S

Salimah H. Meghani

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

B

Brooke Worster

Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, PA

R

Rebecca Ashare

University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY