Association of omentectomy with reduced therapeutic efficacy of lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab in patients with endometrial cancer.
Abstract
e17613 Background: Recently, omentum has been suggested to be immunologically active. Therefore, we investigated the effect of prior omentectomy on the efficacy of lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (LP) therapy in patients with endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: This retrospective study included 95 patients with recurrent EC treated with LP between December 2021 and March 2025 at our institutions. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox regression analyses included factors such as omentectomy status, MMR status, FIGO stage (I/II or III/IV), histology (endometrioid or others), platinum-free interval (PFI) (<6 or ≥6 months) and the number of prior regimens (1 or ≥2). Results: Overall, 95 patients were enrolled in the study (omentectomy group, 50; no-omentectomy group, 45). Moreover, six patients in the no-omentectomy group, did not undergo primary surgery and predominantly presented with stage IV disease. Molecular profiling was used to identify 9 dMMR and 86 pMMR tumors. Advanced stage (III/IV), endometrioid histology, PFI <6 month, and ≥2 prior regimens were observed in 64%, 42%, 64%, and 30% of the patients in the omentectomy group and 58%, 60%, 60%, and 31% of the patients in the no-omentectomy group. Patients in the no-omentectomy had a significantly longer median PFS (15.4 vs. 8.2 months; p = 0.001) and OS (34.9 vs. 21.7 months; p = 0.090). Multivariable analysis revealed that omentectomy was independently associated with shorter PFS (HR 2.18; 95% CI, 1.23–3.88; p = 0.008), but was not an independent predictor of OS (HR 1.11; 95% CI 0.58–2.12; p = 0.750) [Table]. Histology-specific analyses of the major subtypes, including endometrioid carcinoma ( n = 48), serous carcinoma ( n = 20), and carcinosarcoma ( n = 18), revealed that omentectomy was associated with more favorable outcomes only in patients with serous carcinoma. Therefore, further analysis, excluding patients with serous carcinoma, was performed. In this non-serous cohort, multivariable Cox regression analyses demonstrated that omentectomy remained independently associated with shorter PFS (HR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.69–6.41; p < 0.001) and had a trend toward shorter OS (HR 1.99; 95% CI, 0.93–4.26; p = 0.076). Conclusions: Patients without prior omentectomy had better outcomes following LP therapy. Thus, omentum may contribute to antitumor immune regulation. Progression-free survival Overall survival Variables HR 95% CI p -value HR 95% CI p -value Omentectomy status OMTx vs No-OMTx 2.18 1.23–3.88 0.008 1.11 0.58–2.12 0.750 MMR status dMMR vs pMMR 0.36 0.13–1.00 0.051 0.19 0.04–0.87 0.032 FIGO stage III/IV vs I/II 1.00 0.58–1.75 0.992 1.48 0.74–2.98 0.272 Histology non-endometrioid vs endometrioid 1.09 0.63–1.88 0.768 2.47 1.22–5.00 0.012 PFI ≥6 vs <6 months 0.47 0.26–0.85 0.012 0.34 0.15–0.77 0.009 Number of prior regimens ≥2 vs 1 0.91 0.51–1.61 0.744 1.03 0.52–2.05 0.937
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (17)
Rintaro Hamada
Toshiyuki Seki
Takuhiro Koba
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Hayato Iso
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Miwako Shimazaki
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
Junki Onishi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Yuki Koike
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Kazuaki Takahashi
Tadaaki Nishikawa
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Masataka Takenaka
Yasushi Iida
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
Motoaki Saito
Nozomu Yanaihara
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Satoshi Takakura
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
Hirokuni Takano
Kyosuke Yamada
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Aikou Okamoto