Association of ctDNA status with upstaging, pathologic outcomes, and genomic alterations in high-risk NMIBC.

C Can Aydogdu (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) B Betty Wang (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) S Sean Thomas McSweeney (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) G Gabriela Diaz (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) T Taeris Guzman (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) S Sahab Ram Dewala (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) R Rakesh Arya M Mikayla Baer (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) A Amanda Nizam (Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) S Shalini Moningi (Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) A Alberto Pieretti (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston Hospital, Weston, FL) C Christopher Weight N Nima Almassi (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) S Samuel Haywood (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) R Rebecca Campbell (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) M Mohit Sindhani (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH) R Robert Abouassaly (Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates) L Laura Bukavina (Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH)

Abstract

831 Background: The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) remains incompletely defined. In high-risk and Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG)–exposed disease, ctDNA detection and genomic profiling may provide insight into disease biology and guide management. We evaluated ctDNA positivity rates and their association with genomic alterations, clinical upstaging, and pathologic outcomes in patients with high-risk NMIBC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 44 patients with histologically confirmed high-risk NMIBC (per AUA criteria) treated at a single institution between 2022-2025. Among BCG-exposed patients, BCG status was categorized as unresponsive per FDA definitions. ctDNA testing was performed using a personalized, tumor-informed assay (Signatera, Natera) at baseline and every 3 months; positivity was defined as detection of ≥2 tumor-specific variants. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) with the Altera assay (Natera) was incorporated when available. Clinical upstaging was defined as progression to ≥cT2 or cN+ disease, and pathologic outcomes after radical cystectomy were evaluated by final stage and nodal status. Results: A total of 44 patients with HR-NMIBC were included (median age 69 years, IQR 59–75); 85% were male and 70% had pure urothelial carcinoma. Median follow-up was 8.2 months (IQR 4.7–11.7). BCG-naïve and BCG-exposed cohorts comprised 55% and 45% of patients, respectively, with 65% of the latter classified as BCG-unresponsive. At presentation, 93% had T1, 5% Tis, and 2% Ta disease; concomitant CIS was observed in 19%. ctDNA positivity was detected in 30% (6/24) of BCG-naïve and 40% (8/20) of BCG-exposed patients. Following clinical and radiologic assessment, upstaging occurred in 36% (5/14) of ctDNA-positive versus 10% (3/30) of ctDNA-negative patients. Overall, 36% (16/44) underwent radical cystectomy; 44% (7/16) were ctDNA-positive, of whom 86% (6/7) had muscle-invasive or locally advanced disease (≥pT2b or pN+), while one had pT1pN0. In contrast, all ctDNA-negative patients (9/9) had negative nodal status (4 pT0N0, 4 < pT1N0, and 1 pT2aN0). Among the 23 patients with available CGP, 8 were concurrently ctDNA-positive. TP53 mutations were more common in ctDNA-positive versus ctDNA-negative patients (88% vs 33%), whereas FGFR3 alterations were less frequent (0% vs 40%). Conclusions: ctDNA positivity in HR-NMIBC correlated with higher rates of clinical upstaging and adverse pathologic findings, including muscle-invasive and nodal disease at cystectomy, whereas ctDNA negativity was largely confined to non-invasive pathology. TP53 enrichment among ctDNA-positive patients suggests a biologically distinct and potentially more aggressive subset. These findings support the potential role of ctDNA as a biomarker for disease biology and risk stratification in HR-NMIBC.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 7_suppl
Published March 01, 2026
Pages 831-831
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (18)

C

Can Aydogdu

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

B

Betty Wang

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

S

Sean Thomas McSweeney

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

G

Gabriela Diaz

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

T

Taeris Guzman

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

S

Sahab Ram Dewala

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

R

Rakesh Arya

M

Mikayla Baer

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

A

Amanda Nizam

Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

S

Shalini Moningi

Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

A

Alberto Pieretti

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston Hospital, Weston, FL

C

Christopher Weight

N

Nima Almassi

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

S

Samuel Haywood

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

R

Rebecca Campbell

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

M

Mohit Sindhani

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

R

Robert Abouassaly

Department of Urology, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

L

Laura Bukavina

Cleveland Clinic Glickman Urologic Institute, Cleveland, OH