Association Between Systemic Anticancer Therapy Administration Near the End of Life With Health Care and Hospice Utilization in Older Adults: A SEER Medicare Analysis of End-of-Life Care Quality

M Maureen E. Canavan (Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) L Lee Cheng J Jenny Jing Xiang (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) J John Kent Lin (Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) D David Hui H Hui Zhao (Center of Ionic Liquid and Green Energy, Beijing Key Laboratory of Solid State Battery and Energy Storage Process, State Key Laboratory of Mesoscience and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering) N Nico Nortje (Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) R Ravin Ratan N Nathan Cherny (Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel) T Trinh Pham (4National Institutes of Health, Molecular Diagnostics Section, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, United States) S Sharon H. Giordano J Jiangong Niu K Kerin B. Adelson (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX)

Abstract

PURPOSE Use of cytotoxic chemotherapy at end-of-life (EOL) is associated with adverse quality of life, increased health care utilization, and lower hospice rates. Although EOL cytotoxic chemotherapy use has declined in recent years, EOL novel (immunotherapy and targeted therapy) use has increased. The association between use of novel therapies at EOL and health care utilization has not been widely studied. METHODS We identified patients within SEER-Medicare who had part D coverage (excluding those with Medicare Advantage) age 66 years and older, and breast, colorectal, lung, prostate, bladder, cervical, kidney, liver, ovarian, pancreatic, melanoma, or uterine cancer. Patients were diagnosed between 2005 and 2019 and died between 2015 and 2020. We analyzed associations between EOL systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) use (overall and by subtype), and health care utilization in the last 30 days of life (emergency department [ED], hospitalization, intensive care unit [ICU], and inpatient death), and hospice with multivariable regression, controlling for sociodemographic and cancer covariates. RESULTS Of 315,089 beneficiaries, 23,970 (7.6%) received SACT within 30 days of death. The breakdown by type was cytotoxic therapy 50.6%, immunotherapy 20.8%, targeted therapy 18%, and combination therapies 10.6%. After adjusting for covariates, any SACT use at EOL was associated with higher ED use (odds ratio [OR], 3.05 [95% CI, 2.95 to 3.15]), hospital admissions (OR, 2.64 [95% CI, 2.56 to 2.72]), ICU admission (OR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.72 to 1.83]), hospital death (OR, 2.02 [95% CI, 1.96 to 2.08]), and lower hospice use (OR, 0.51 [95% CI, 0.50 to 0.53]) compared with no SACT. All subtypes of SACT were individually associated with higher health care utilization and lower hospice use ( P < .001). CONCLUSION All subtypes of SACT use were associated with markers of worse-quality EOL care. These data can inform decisions for current care guidelines and efforts to reduce overutilization.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 31
Published November 01, 2025
Pages 3391-3402
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (13)

M

Maureen E. Canavan

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT

L

Lee Cheng

J

Jenny Jing Xiang

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

J

John Kent Lin

Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

D

David Hui

H

Hui Zhao

Center of Ionic Liquid and Green Energy, Beijing Key Laboratory of Solid State Battery and Energy Storage Process, State Key Laboratory of Mesoscience and Engineering, Institute of Process Engineering

N

Nico Nortje

Department of Critical Care Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

R

Ravin Ratan

N

Nathan Cherny

Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

T

Trinh Pham

4National Institutes of Health, Molecular Diagnostics Section, Center for Cancer Research, Bethesda, United States

S

Sharon H. Giordano

J

Jiangong Niu

K

Kerin B. Adelson

MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX