Association between smoking, tumor genetics, and outcomes in men with metastatic prostate cancer.
Abstract
5052 Background: Smoking has been associated with increased metastatic prostate cancer (mPC) mortality, but the mechanisms behind this association are largely unknown. We hypothesized that smoking promotes genetic alterations associated with aggressive disease and/or the transformation to neuroendocrine prostate cancer (NEPC). Methods: We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical genomic database for this retrospective analysis. We examined associations between patient characteristics and tumor genetic data with smoking exposure at diagnosis (current, former, never and pack years) and with clinical outcomes, including overall survival (OS) from diagnosis, OS from metastasis, and NEPC status. Patients with unknown smoking status or incomplete/empty/insufficient NGS entries were excluded from analysis. Results: We identified 2353 men with mPC and next generation somatic tumor sequencing available for analysis in PROMISE, including 8.1% current, 39.5% former, and 52.4% never smokers. Current smokers were more likely to be younger, present with metastatic (M1 or N1) disease at diagnosis, and were less likely to have prior local therapy (all p<0.001). Current smoking was associated with worse OS from diagnosis (99.9 mo in current vs 137 mo in former, and 139.4 mo in never smokers; p=0.008), which remained significant after adjusting for disease characteristics (HR 1.27 95% CI 1.01-1.59). No differences in OS from metastasis were observed for amongst the three groups (current 68.1mo, former 60.3 mo, and never 64.2 mo; p=0.86) We also found no difference in the percentage of NEPC at initial diagnosis or at any time between current, former, and never smokers (p=0.8). However, positive associations were observed between smoking status and genetic alterations in SPOP (current: 15%, former 6.7%, never 3.8%; p= 0.018), FGFR1 (current 10%, former 0.4%, never 1.1% p=0.001), and ARID1A (current 5.1%, former 2.2%, never 0.4%; p=0.035) in mHSPC. No other associations between smoking status and genes of interest were identified. Conclusions: Active smoking is associated with worse overall and prostate cancer specific survival as compared to never/former smoking and was associated with specific tumor genetic alterations but not small cell/NEPC transformation. Association of tumor genetics with smoking status; alterations detected in hormone sensitive tissue only. Characteristic Current N = 39 1 Former N = 224 1 Never N = 264 1 p-value TP53 17 (44%) 79 (35%) 100 (38%) 0.58 RB1 3 (7.7%) 11 (4.9%) 17 (6.4%) 0.59 PTEN 8 (21%) 55 (25%) 60 (23%) 0.81 BRCA2 8 (21%) 20 (8.9%) 35 (13%) 0.07 MYC 3 (7.7%) 18 (8.0%) 11 (4.2%) 0.15 SPOP 6 (15%) 15 (6.7%) 10 (3.8%) 0.02 FGFR1 4 (10%) 1 (0.4%) 3 (1.1%) 0.001 ARID1A 2 (5.1%) 5 (2.2%) 1 (0.4%) 0.04 PIK3CA 2 (5.1%) 9 (4.0%) 13 (4.9%) 0.80 1 n (%).
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (19)
Christopher Choi
Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
Matthew Labriola
Duke Cancer Institute Center for Prostate and Urologic Cancers, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC
Clara Hwang
Pedro C. Barata
Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine University Hospitals, Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine Cleveland Ohio USA
Frank Cameron Cackowski
Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
Amanda Broderick
Division of Medical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC
Mehmet Asim Bilen
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
Deepak Kilari
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Laura Graham
University of Colorado, Aurora, CO
Abhishek Tripathi
Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte California USA
Rohan Garje
3Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, United States
Vadim S. Koshkin
Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine University of California‐San Francisco San Francisco California USA
Tanya B. Dorff
Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center
Michael Thomas Schweizer
University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Zachery R. Reichert
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
Alexandra Sokolova
Oregon Health & Science University, Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR
Catherine Handy Marshall
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
Andrew J. Armstrong