Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the ASC4FIRST trial

J Jorge E. Cortes (1Department of Medicine, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA) T Timothy P. Hughes (2Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia) J Jianxiang Wang D Dong-Wook Kim D Dennis Dong Hwan Kim (16Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada) J Jiri Mayer (6Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic) Y Yeow-Tee Goh (7Department of Hematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore) P Philipp le Coutre (8Department of Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany) G Gabriel Etienne (9Hematology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France) I Inho Kim (Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology) D David J. Andorsky (11Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Boulder, CO) F Felice Bombaci (12CML Patients Group, CML Advocates Network, Turin, Italy) G Ghayas C. Issa N Naoto Takahashi S Shruti Kapoor (15Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ) R Rajendra Jinwal (16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) K Kamel Malek (16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) T Tracey McCulloch (16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) L Lillian Yau (16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) R Richard A. Larson A Andreas Hochhaus (18Department of Hematology/Oncology, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany)

Abstract

Abstract Many patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 147, Issue 13
Published March 26, 2026
Pages 1433-1446
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (21)

J

Jorge E. Cortes

1Department of Medicine, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA

T

Timothy P. Hughes

2Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

J

Jianxiang Wang

D

Dong-Wook Kim

D

Dennis Dong Hwan Kim

16Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

J

Jiri Mayer

6Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Y

Yeow-Tee Goh

7Department of Hematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore

P

Philipp le Coutre

8Department of Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany

G

Gabriel Etienne

9Hematology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France

I

Inho Kim

Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology

D

David J. Andorsky

11Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Boulder, CO

F

Felice Bombaci

12CML Patients Group, CML Advocates Network, Turin, Italy

G

Ghayas C. Issa

N

Naoto Takahashi

S

Shruti Kapoor

15Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ

R

Rajendra Jinwal

16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

K

Kamel Malek

16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

T

Tracey McCulloch

16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

L

Lillian Yau

16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

R

Richard A. Larson

A

Andreas Hochhaus

18Department of Hematology/Oncology, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany