Asciminib demonstrates superior efficacy and safety in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia in the ASC4FIRST trial
Abstract
Abstract Many patients receiving frontline tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML-CP) experience inadequate disease control and/or adverse events (AEs) that impair quality of life. Treatments offering optimal efficacy, safety, and tolerability will support long-term therapy. In the primary analysis from the ASC4FIRST trial, a phase 3 randomized trial comparing asciminib with investigator-selected TKIs (IS-TKIs) in newly diagnosed CML-CP, asciminib demonstrated superior efficacy vs all IS-TKIs and vs imatinib in the imatinib stratum, meeting both primary objectives. In the secondary analysis (2.2 years' median follow-up), major molecular response (MMR) rate at week 96 was 74.1% with asciminib vs 52.0% with IS-TKIs (treatment difference, 22.4% [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.6-31.3]; 1-sided P< .001) and 76.2% with asciminib vs 47.1% with imatinib in the imatinib stratum (treatment difference, 29.7% [95% CI, 17.6-41.8]; 1-sided P< .001), meeting both key secondary objectives. MMR rate was 72.0% with asciminib vs 56.9% with second-generation (2G) TKIs (treatment difference, 15.1% [95% CI, 2.3-28.0]; 1-sided P< .05), suggesting possible clinical benefit, although the study was not designed to formally confirm statistical significance for this secondary end point. Safety/tolerability remained favorable with asciminib vs IS-TKIs. Dose reductions and interruptions, respectively, occurred with asciminib (18.5%; 46.5%), imatinib (23.2%; 47.5%), and 2G TKIs (54.9%; 63.7%). The hazard ratio for time to discontinuation of treatment due to AEs for asciminib vs 2G TKIs was 0.46 (95% CI, 0.215-0.997). With longer follow-up, asciminib continued to demonstrate a favorable benefit-risk profile over IS-TKIs and imatinib, supporting its potential as a treatment option for newly diagnosed CML-CP. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04971226.
Article Details
Authors (21)
Jorge E. Cortes
1Department of Medicine, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, GA
Timothy P. Hughes
2Precision Cancer Medicine Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
Jianxiang Wang
Dong-Wook Kim
Dennis Dong Hwan Kim
16Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Jiri Mayer
6Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
Yeow-Tee Goh
7Department of Hematology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
Philipp le Coutre
8Department of Oncology and Hematology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Gabriel Etienne
9Hematology Department, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
Inho Kim
Division of Engineering and Applied Science, California Institute of Technology
David J. Andorsky
11Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Boulder, CO
Felice Bombaci
12CML Patients Group, CML Advocates Network, Turin, Italy
Ghayas C. Issa
Naoto Takahashi
Shruti Kapoor
15Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ
Rajendra Jinwal
16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Kamel Malek
16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Tracey McCulloch
16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Lillian Yau
16Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
Richard A. Larson
Andreas Hochhaus
18Department of Hematology/Oncology, Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Germany