ASCENT-04: Analysis of efficacy by biomarker subgroups with sacituzumab govitecan (SG) + pembrolizumab (pembro) vs chemotherapy (chemo) + pembro in participants (pts) with previously untreated PD-L1+ metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC).
Abstract
1013 Background: In the phase 3 ASCENT-04/KEYNOTE-D19 study (NCT05382286) SG + pembro showed significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) improvement vs chemo + pembro in pts with previously untreated PD-L1+ mTNBC. SG + pembro exhibited a manageable safety profile consistent with prior studies for each agent. We present preplanned exploratory efficacy analyses in ASCENT-04 by biomarker subgroups. Methods: 443 pts received (1:1 ratio) SG + pembro in 21-day cycles or chemo (gemcitabine + carboplatin; taxane) + pembro. From centrally tested fresh or archival tumor samples, Trop-2 expression was determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC), tumor BRCA (tBRCA) status by whole exome sequencing, and HER2 expression by in situ hybridization (ISH) + IHC. Pts were grouped by Trop-2 expression quartiles, tBRCA status (wild-type [WT] or mutant [mut] in BRCA1/BRCA2 /both), and HER2 status (IHC 0 vs Low [IHC 1+ or IHC 2+/ISH–]). Biomarker subgroups were analyzed descriptively for association with PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR); other outcomes by biomarker status are forthcoming. Results: Median Trop-2 H-score was 280, ranges: quartile 1 (Q1) 0-224, Q2 225-279, Q3 280-298, Q4 299-300. SG + pembro demonstrated longer PFS by BICR in Q3/Q4 vs Q1/Q2, and benefit was observed for SG + pembro vs chemo + pembro in all quartiles (Table). Hazard ratios (HR; 95% confidence interval [CI]) were: Q1, 0.81 (0.48-1.36); Q2, 0.73 (0.44-1.22); Q3, 0.46 (0.27-0.80); Q4, 0.57 (0.33-0.99). Proportion of pts with tBRCA mutations (~20%) was similar between treatment groups. Longer PFS was observed with SG + pembro with HR (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.49-0.91) in the tBRCA WT and 0.88 (0.45-1.74) in the tBRCA mut subgroups. PFS was longer with SG + pembro vs chemo + pembro in the HER2 IHC 0 and HER2 low subgroups, HR (95% CI) 0.69 (0.46-1.04) and 0.67 (0.48-0.92), respectively. Conclusions: SG + pembro demonstrated longer PFS vs chemo + pembro across all Trop-2, tBRCA, and HER2 subgroups. These analyses strengthen support for the significant, clinically meaningful benefit of SG + pembro as first-line treatment for mTNBC across subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT05382286 . Efficacy, BICR N Median PFS (95% CI), mo Biomarker Subgroup SG + pembro Chemo + pembro SG + pembro Chemo + pembro HR (95% CI) Trop-2(n = 400) Q1 48 47 9.3(7.4-19.4) 9.0(6.0-10.9) 0.81(0.48-1.36) Q2 50 50 9.6(7.3-16.7) 7.4(6.9-9.7) 0.73(0.44-1.22) Q3 55 50 13.5(9.3-NR) 8.4(5.6-10.8) 0.46(0.27-0.80) Q4 51 49 16.6(8.1-NR) 9.2(5.5-11.3) 0.57(0.33-0.99) tBRCA(n = 332) WT 130 131 9.6(7.6-16.7) 7.4(6.9-9.2) 0.67(0.49-0.91) Mut 39 32 16.6(7.5-NR) 12.9(7.1-NR) 0.88(0.45-1.74) HER2(n = 435) IHC 0 84 82 16.6(9.1-21.2) 9.0(7.2-10.8) 0.69(0.46-1.04) Low 133 136 11.2(9.1-16.6) 7.7(7.0-9.4) 0.67(0.48-0.92)
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Sara M. Tolaney
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Peter Schmid
Centre for Experimental Cancer Medicine, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London
Evandro de Azambuja
Institut Jules Bordet, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles and Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels
Kevin Kalinsky
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta
Sung-Bae Kim
Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Clinton Yam
Bernardo Leon Rapoport
The Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Clinical and Translational Research Unit (CTRU), Department of Immunology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pretoria, Saxonworld, South Africa
Seock-Ah Im
Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University, Seoul, South Korea
Barbara Pistilli
Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Wassim Mchayleh
AdventHealth Cancer Institute, Orlando, FL
David W. Cescon
Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto
Junichiro Watanabe
Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo
Alejandro Lara
Scientia Investigación Clínica, Chihuahua, Mexico
Ruffo Freitas-Junior
Araujo Jorge Cancer Hospital, Goias Anticancer Association, Goiânia, Brazil
Alain Lortholary
Groupe d'Investigateurs National des Etudes des Cancers Ovariens et du sein (GINECO) and Hôpital Privé du Confluent, Nantes, France
Catherine Lai
Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA
Kenneth Caldwell
17Gilead Sciences, Inc, Foster City, CA
Meghna Das Thakur
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA
Yajia Zhang
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA
Sherene Loi