Arctic soil carbon insulation averts large spring cooling from surface–atmosphere feedbacks

R Rémi Gaillard (Laboratoire de Géologie) P Philippe Peylin (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement) P Patricia Cadule (Laboratoire de météorologie dynamique/Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure/Paris Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique) V Vladislav Bastrikov (Science Partners) F Frédérique Chéruy (Laboratoire de météorologie dynamique/Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure/Paris Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique) A Amélie Cuynet (Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement) J Josefine Ghattas (Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université-CNRS) D Dan Zhu B Bertrand Guenet (Laboratoire de Géologie)

Abstract

The insulative properties of soil organic carbon (SOC) and surface organic layers (moss, lichens, litter) regulate surface–atmosphere energy exchanges in the Arctic through a coupling with soil temperatures. However, a physical description of this process is lacking in many climate models, potentially biasing their high-latitude climate predictions. Using a coupled surface–atmosphere model, we identified a strong feedback loop between soil insulation, surface air temperature, and snowfall. Without insulation, the latent heat needed for soil ice thawing leads to a late spring and summer cold bias in surface air temperature (above 2 °C) over Arctic regions. The integration of soil insulation eliminates this bias and significantly improves the simulation of permafrost dynamics. Our findings, including the potential consequences of large perturbations (e.g., fires), highlight the importance of combining soil water freezing with a physical representation of SOC and surface organic layer insulation in Earth system models, to improve Arctic climate predictions.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 122, Issue 3
Published January 21, 2025
ISSN 0027-8424
Publisher National Academy of Sciences

Authors (9)

R

Rémi Gaillard

Laboratoire de Géologie

P

Philippe Peylin

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement

P

Patricia Cadule

Laboratoire de météorologie dynamique/Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure/Paris Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique

V

Vladislav Bastrikov

Science Partners

F

Frédérique Chéruy

Laboratoire de météorologie dynamique/Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure/Paris Sciences et Lettres, Sorbonne Université, Ecole Polytechnique

A

Amélie Cuynet

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement

J

Josefine Ghattas

Institut Pierre Simon Laplace, Sorbonne Université-CNRS

D

Dan Zhu

B

Bertrand Guenet

Laboratoire de Géologie