Applying learning science principles (LSP) through a simulation session (SIM) for oncology trainees (OT) about fertility preservation (FP) in patients (pts) with cancer and treatment (tx) of pregnant pts (TPP) with cancer.

T Tanmayi Pai (Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA) G Guilherme Sacchi De Camargo Correia (10Mayo Clinic, Hematology/Oncology, Jacksonville, United States) E Ewa Maria Wysokinska (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) A Ahmed Abdelhakeem (2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States) N Nayef Hikmat Abdel-Razeq (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) O Oluwatayo Adeoye (1Mayo Clinic, Hematology/Oncology, Rochester, United States) M Mahmood Aldapt (2Mayo Clinic Florida, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Jacksonville, United States) F Firas Baidoun (21Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) D Dina Elantably (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) K Kush Gupta (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) S Saivaishnavi Kamatham (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) O Osama M MoSalem (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) R Reema Tawfiq (10Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States) N Nathaniel Edward Wiest (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) E Emily Wolf (1Mayo Clinic, Hematology and Oncology, Jacksonville, United States) R Rohit Rao M Madiha Iqbal W Winston Tan S Sandra Ventro (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL) R Rami Manochakian (Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL)

Abstract

9029 Background: Addressing guideline concordant FP and TPP with cancer is challenging, especially for OT. SIM, a well-known education tool, has not been traditionally used to teach these topics. As part of the hematology/oncology fellowship curriculum, we designed a SIM applying LSP to bridge this educational gap. Methods: Applying LSP of contrasting cases, elaboration, feedback, generation and just-in-time telling, chief OTs and faculty designed a SIM with 3 clinical scenarios (CS) and 3 standardized pts (SP): FP for a female pt hospitalized for acute lymphoblastic leukemia tx, FP for a male pt in clinic for germ cell tumor tx, and breast cancer tx for a pregnant pt in 2 nd trimester. OT received written educational materials (WEM) and attended a lecture 1 week and 1 day pre SIM, respectively. OT were split into 2 groups; 1 started in the FP CS and 1 in the TPP CS, and then they switched. To reduce cognitive overload, each OT participated in 1 of 2 FP CS: half in the female FP CS and half in the male. Faculty and chiefs led debriefing sessions after all CS. The FP debrief ended with a special “learner as a teacher” part, where OT who attended the female CS taught those from the male CS about their topic and vice versa. The SIM concluded with "take-home" points. Pre (after having WEM) and post SIM anonymous surveys and verbal feedback assessed OT comfort, perceptions, and knowledge. Results: A 3 hour SIM with 14 OT and 5 faculty was completed successfully. SIM ended with all OT verbally sharing a learning point and positive feedback. All OT filled pre and post SIM surveys. Pre SIM, 17% reported having prior FP education, and 42% had prior TPP education. However, only 8% and 25% felt adequately prepared for FP and TPP discussions, respectively. Post SIM survey showed major improvement in comfort and knowledge about FP and TPP (see table 1). 75% of OT favored a combination of SIM and learning by teaching over other SIM formats. 83% supported having a TPP lecture before SIM. 100% reported satisfaction with FP and TPP SIM’s quality and wanted similar activities in the future. 92% were satisfied with the learner as a teacher tool. 100% felt education about FP and TPP with cancer should be part of fellowship training. Moral/cultural concerns were discussed as possible challenges in FP education. Conclusions: The application of LSP through SIM significantly increased OTs’ comfort discussing FP and TPP with cancer, and objectively enhanced their knowledge on these topics compared to after reading WEM. The SIM was largely perceived as a successful activity to educate about challenging topics and should become part of fellowship curriculum. Pre SIM % Post SIM % Comfortable addressing FP 17 92 Comfortable addressing TPP 8 100 Correct answers about female FP 63 83 Correct answers about male FP 67 94 Correct answers about TPP with cancer 68 98

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
Pages 9029-9029
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

T

Tanmayi Pai

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, GA

G

Guilherme Sacchi De Camargo Correia

10Mayo Clinic, Hematology/Oncology, Jacksonville, United States

E

Ewa Maria Wysokinska

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

A

Ahmed Abdelhakeem

2Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States

N

Nayef Hikmat Abdel-Razeq

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

O

Oluwatayo Adeoye

1Mayo Clinic, Hematology/Oncology, Rochester, United States

M

Mahmood Aldapt

2Mayo Clinic Florida, Division of Hematology-Oncology, Jacksonville, United States

F

Firas Baidoun

21Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

D

Dina Elantably

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

K

Kush Gupta

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

S

Saivaishnavi Kamatham

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

O

Osama M MoSalem

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

R

Reema Tawfiq

10Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, United States

N

Nathaniel Edward Wiest

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

E

Emily Wolf

1Mayo Clinic, Hematology and Oncology, Jacksonville, United States

R

Rohit Rao

M

Madiha Iqbal

W

Winston Tan

S

Sandra Ventro

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL

R

Rami Manochakian

Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL