Apalutamide in Chinese patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC): Final analysis from the retrospective real-world CAPABLE study.

Y Yong Wang Y Yuanjie Niu Z Zhiquan Hu (School of Physical Science and Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Frontier Material Physics and Devices & Suzhou Key Laboratory of Intelligent Photoelectric Perception, Soochow University 1 , Suzhou 215006,) Z Zhixian Yu (First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China) Z Zhiping Wang (School of Physics and Technology) Q Qing Zou J Jinming Di (The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China) W Weiping Li (Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics) N Ning Zhang J Jianmin Zhuo (14Johnson & Johnson, Shanghai, China) N Na Chen X Xiaoxue Di (Johnson & Johnson, Beijing, China)

Abstract

e17103 Background: Apalutamide (APA) combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the standard care for mHSPC and is associated with significant survival benefits. Given limited data from Chinese patients (pts), this study aimed to conduct the largest observational investigation to date to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of APA plus ADT in Chinese pts with mHSPC, with a focus on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline and disease progression. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter observational study enrolled adult pts with mHSPC who initiated on APA plus ADT between 1 Jan 2022 and 31 May 2024 (index date), with follow-up through 31 May 2025, utilizing data from chart review. The observation period for each pt spanned from the index date to loss to follow-up, death, or 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was the proportion of pts achieving PSA≤0.2 ng/mL (PSA0.2) at Month (M) 3. Other endpoints included proportion of pts achieving a decrease in PSA ≥50% or ≥90% (PSA50/90), PSA progression, clinical and radiographic disease progression events within 12 mo. The number and proportion of pts achieving PSA0.2 or PSA50/90 along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined by using Clopper–Pears on exact method on the basis of observed case data. Subgroup analyses were performed by age ( < 65, ≥65 to < 75, and ≥75 yr) and Gleason score (≤7 or > 7) on PSA0.2. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected for safety evaluation. Results: There were 300 pts with mHSPC treated with APA plus ADT analyzed. Median treatment duration was 12.8 (range 0.1–13.5) mo. Baseline characteristics were as follows: median age 72 (range 40–97) yr, Gleason score > 7 in 84% (172/204) of pts, tumor stage T3 in 22/84 and T4 in 51/84 pts, median PSA100 (range 0.1–5000) ng/mL. PSA0.2 response was 41.1% at M3, increasing to 62% at M6 and 69.7% at M12. PSA50 and PSA90 responses were 98.8% and 92% at M3, respectively. PSA progression (increase ≥50% and ≥5 ng/mL above nadir) occurred in 7 pts; clinical and radiographic disease progression occurred in 2 pts and 1 pt. Regarding safety analysis, ADRs were reported in 13% of pts, with ADRs (grade 3–4) reported in 1%. 4 deaths were reported. PSA0.2 response did not show meaningful difference across subgroups. Conclusions: The CAPABLE, the largest published APA real-world study in China, reveals a notably high PSA response for APA plus ADT, with infrequent progression reported, indicating a favorable prognosis for pts with mHSPC. The regimen also has a tolerable safety profile. PSA response among pts with mHSPC after APA plus ADT treatment. % (n/N) 95% CI PSA0.2M3M6M12 41.1% (76/185)62% (98/158)69.7% (99/142) 33.9%–48.5%54%–69.6%61.5%–77.1% PSA50M3M6M12 98.8% (160/162)97.1% (134/138)95.3% (121/127) 95.6%–99.9%92.7%–99.2%90%–98.2% PSA90M3M6M12 92% (149/162)91.3% (126/138)92.9% (118/127) 86.7%–95.7%85.3%–95.4%87%–96.7%

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (12)

Y

Yong Wang

Y

Yuanjie Niu

Z

Zhiquan Hu

School of Physical Science and Technology, Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Frontier Material Physics and Devices & Suzhou Key Laboratory of Intelligent Photoelectric Perception, Soochow University 1 , Suzhou 215006,

Z

Zhixian Yu

First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

Z

Zhiping Wang

School of Physics and Technology

Q

Qing Zou

J

Jinming Di

The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China

W

Weiping Li

Beijing National Laboratory for Condensed Matter Physics

N

Ning Zhang

J

Jianmin Zhuo

14Johnson & Johnson, Shanghai, China

N

Na Chen

X

Xiaoxue Di

Johnson & Johnson, Beijing, China