Anti-TIM3 with hypomethylating agent revives NK and cytotoxic CD4+ T cell activity in patients with AML or MDS
Abstract
Abstract Recent clinical trials in AML combining immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD1, anti-CTLA4) with hypomethylating agents have yielded only modest response rates. However, there has been exceptional responders achieving durable complete responses in all these trials. TIM3 is a checkpoint molecule expressed both on immune and leukemic cells, making it an interesting target in AML. Here, we conducted a comprehensive immunomonitoring of a phase Ib trial (NCT03066648) evaluating decitabine in combination with anti-TIM3 antibody sabatolimab (MBG453). We studied paired bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood samples from 11 unfit newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML patients and 1 MDS patient with single-cell RNA and T cell receptor sequencing (scRNA+TCRαβ-seq) and flow cytometry. We also performed co-culture assays of primary immune and leukemic cells with scRNA+TCRαβ-seq readout in a patient with a durable complete response. In scRNA+TCRαβ-seq data, HAVCR2 (encoding TIM3) is highly expressed in NK cells, myeloid cells, and unconventional T cells, with some expression in CD8+ T cells. This contrasts with PDCD1 (encoding PD1) and CTLA4, which are primarily expressed in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, respectively, albeit at low levels in AML. At baseline, responders had higher proportions of CD4+ T cells and B lymphocytes, whereas non-responders had more cytotoxic CD8+ T cells, which was confirmed by flow cytometry. After starting anti-TIM3+HMA therapy, both groups showed increased numbers of CD8+ T cells and NK cells. Responders to anti-TIM3+HMA therapy generally had more mature (CD56dim and adaptive) NK cells, with key transcriptional changes in type I/II interferon (IFN) and NF-κB pathways. Functional co-culture assayswith primary blasts from a complete responder revealed three NK activation states: cell-contact activated, cytokine-secreting, and type I IFN-responsive. NK cells showed enhanced type I IFN responses after therapy correlating with clinical remission, but this response was reduced when NK cells were co-cultured with blasts from a relapse time point, suggesting potential immune evasion. Cytotoxic CD4+ T cells were more abundant and highly clonal in pre-treatment samples from responders. In an exceptional responder with concomitant CD4+ T-LGLL diagnosis, the dominant CD4+ T-LGLL clone comprised 21% of the TCR repertoire at baseline, persisted at remission, but fell to 7% at relapse. Transcriptomic analysis showed upregulation of IFNG and TNF post-therapy, with a subset peaking soon after treatment. To assess whether the T-LGLL clone targets patient's leukemic cells, we engineered Jurkat reporter cells with the TCRαβ from the CD4+ T-LGLL clone and performed co-culture assays with scRNA-seq readout. In comparison to mock transduced cells, T-LGLL reporter cells showed upregulation of type I IFN genes when co-cultured with patient's leukemia cells, especially in presence of antigen-presenting cells. In co-culture of patient's own T-LGLL cells, pre-therapy cells responded strongly to blasts from screening but lost reactivity to relapse blasts, while post-therapy T-LGLL cells retained activity to both. Exhausted CD8+ T cells were rare in AML BM (<0.5% pre-treatment), most CD8+ T cells exhibited effector or memory phenotypes. Functional co-culture assays showed that CD8+ T cells retained robust activation capacity, marked by TNF and IFNG expression, when co-cultured with autologous blasts. Anti-TIM3+HMA therapy preferentially expanded small CD8+ T cell clones in responders, whereas non-responders showed expansion of larger, more cytotoxic clones, some of which were recognized to target viral epitopes. ScRNA-seq analysis of myeloid cells revealed that responders had a higher proportion of differentiated myeloid cells, such as classical monocytes. In the exceptional responder, relapse blasts in co-culture upregulated immune evasion genes (e.g., CD274 encoding PDL1) and showed the highest HLA class I expression, indicating putative immune escape mechanisms from T and NK cells, respectively.Our study provides a comprehensive analysis of anti-TIM3 in combination with decitabine in AML/MDS. We demonstrate that TIM3 blockade modulates the immune landscape by activating mature and adaptive NK cells, promotes cytotoxic CD4+ T cells, and primes small CD8+ T cell clones for expansion. Our results suggest that cytotoxic CD4+ T-LGLL cells may boost responses to immune checkpoint therapy in AML.
Article Details
Authors (22)
Sofia Forstén
1Translational Immunology Research Program and Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Brittany Ford
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Johannes Smolander
Oscar E. Brück
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Sofie Lundgren
1Translational Immunology Research Program and Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Anna Kreutzman
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Olli Dufva
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Matti Kankainen
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Mette Ilander
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Hanna Lähteenmäki
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Tiina Kasanen
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Jay Klievink
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Judith Leitner
5Centre for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Institute of Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
Peter Steinberger
Mika Kontro
Harri Lähdesmäki
7Aalto University, Department of Computer Science, Espoo, Finland
Catherine Sabatos-Peyton
8Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
Mikael Rinne
8Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Cambridge, United States
Kimmo Porkka
43Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Karita Peltonen
1Hematology Research Unit Helsinki, University of Helsinki, and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki, Finland
Jani Huuhtanen
1Translational Immunology Research Program and Department of Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Satu Mustjoki