Anodic H <sub>2</sub> O <sub>2</sub> Production via CO <sub>3</sub> <sup>2−</sup> /HCO <sub>3</sub> <sup>−</sup> ‐Mediated Spillover Effect in Three‐Phase Electrochemical System

M Mengdi Sun (School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China) J Jiating Chen (School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China) Y Yang Peng (Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations, College of Energy) C Chengyu Duan (School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China) Y Yonghao Shen (School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China) H Huimin Liu Z Zheshun Ou (School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China) G Guanghui Luo (School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China) Y Yuxin Wang (Department of Chemistry) J Jimmy C. Yu (Department of Chemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong 999077, China) Z Zhuofeng Hu

Abstract

ABSTRACT Two‐electron water oxidation reaction (2e − WOR) mediated by (bi)carbonate (CO 3 2− /HCO 3 − ) is promising for anodic H 2 O 2 production. However, previous H 2 O 2 yields are usually unsatisfactory due to low local CO 3 2− /HCO 3 − concentration at the solid/liquid interface. These sluggish reaction rates mainly result from the restricted ion diffusion, and the obstacle of by‐product O 2 bubbles. To resolve this puzzle, a three‐phase WOR system based on CO 2 (g)/dual‐catalyst composite (s)/KOH (l) is adopted. At the three‐phase interface, a high local concentration of CO 3 2− /HCO 3 − can form in the CO 2 adsorption unit and transfer to the WOR catalyst unit via the CO 3 2− /HCO 3 − ‐mediated spillover effect. As a result, the largest H 2 O 2 yield of 51.62 mM at 50 mA cm −2 was realized, superior to that of the conventional two‐phase system. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations, electrochemical and CO 2 adsorption tests, and in situ Fourier transform infrared spectra (FTIR) results jointly confirmed the larger adsorption amount of CO 3 2− /HCO 3 − ions, the spillover of CO 3 2− /HCO 3 − and their transformation to HCO 4 − , and the whole reaction processes from CO 2 adsorption to final H 2 O 2 production at the three‐phase interface. This is the first application of the three‐phase design in WOR, which can provide guidance for efficient H 2 O 2 synthesis in 2e − WORs and can also be applied in other electrochemical WORs.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 65, Issue 11
Published March 09, 2026
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Mengdi Sun

School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

J

Jiating Chen

School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

Y

Yang Peng

Soochow Institute for Energy and Materials Innovations, College of Energy

C

Chengyu Duan

School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

Y

Yonghao Shen

School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

H

Huimin Liu

Z

Zheshun Ou

School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

G

Guanghui Luo

School of Environmental Science and Engineering Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Remediation Technology Sun Yat‐sen University Guangzhou China

Y

Yuxin Wang

Department of Chemistry

J

Jimmy C. Yu

Department of Chemistry, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong 999077, China

Z

Zhuofeng Hu