Analysis of the implementation model of the organized screening strategy using the pCR DNA molecular test as the primary test for detecting high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) for the control and elimination of cervical cancer: Pilot project for nationalization in Brazil.

J Jurema Telles O Lima (IMIP-Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil) L Leticia Telles Sales (Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil) C Caio Arruda (SES PE, Recife, Brazil) P Patricia Silveira Rodrigues (SES PE, Recife, Brazil) C Conceição Cardozo (SES PE, Recife, Brazil) C Candice LIMA Santos (IMIP SES/PE, Recife, Brazil) C Carla Rameri Alexandre Silva De Azevedo (Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira-IMIP, Brazilian Group of Gynecological Oncology (EVA), Recife, Brazil) M Mozart Julio Tabosa Sales (SES PE imip, Recife, Brazil) C Carolina Bezerra Patriota (IMIP, Recife, Brazil) R Rosalva Raimundo Silva (FIOCRUZ IMIP, Recife, Brazil)

Abstract

e13536 Background: Cervical cancer (CC) is a disease with high incidence and disproportionate mortality in low-income and socially vulnerable regions. In 2024, the Brazilian Ministry of Health decided to incorporate molecular tests for the detection of oncogenic HPV DNA PCR as a public policy, as a primary screening method, within an organized screening process and in line with the CC elimination strategy. Pilot projects are being initiated in the pre-implementation phase on a larger scale to analyze partial results of the the organized population screening program for women at risk of cervical cancer in Pernambuco, Brazil. Methods: analytical study from September 2023 - December 2024 of the files of the multiple national public registries . The primary screening test was a biological sampling collection method for high-risk HPV testing, HPV 16 and 18 tested separately and high-risk (AR) other HPV (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 56, 58, 59, 66 and 68). Liquid-based cytology analysis was performed on the same material collected and, if altered, the patient was referred for colposcopy. The Bethesda System was used for cytological diagnosis. Patients with identified high-risk lesions were referred for treatment according to the guidelines and, together with the group and the professionals involved, an analysis matrix of the essential criteria for an organized screening program (IArC/ WHO) was carried out in accordance with the goals of the WHO for the elimination of CC and identified opportunities for improvements for a new stage of implementation. Results: Until January 2025, 21,273 samples collected in 23 municipalities were processed, 68.6% in urban areas, (12.0%) 2,510 women have oncogenic HPV: 398 HPV 16 (16%), HPV 18 150 (6%) and 1,962 HPV AR OTHERS (9.4%) and 0.3% inconclusive. 316 (1.5)%.The time for the HPV test result was approximately 14 days. were collected outside the age range, the majority < 25 years old, and among those who tested positive the majority were HPV AR others (94%). The majority of women were black/brown and 15% identified as yellow. The target percentage of collection for the first round varied between municipalities 138% to 14.6%. a prototype of a unified information system was developed for the journey. Conclusions: The collection and implementation of HPV testing is feasible and has a high level of acceptance by users and professionals. However, it is necessary to identify inequities in order to coordinate actions according to the criteria. Clear agreements and explicit responsibilities are needed with a high level of intersectoral cooperation between the national, regional and local levels.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (10)

J

Jurema Telles O Lima

IMIP-Instituto de Medicina Integral Professor Fernando Figueira, Recife, Brazil

L

Leticia Telles Sales

Hospital Sírio Libanês, São Paulo, Brazil

C

Caio Arruda

SES PE, Recife, Brazil

P

Patricia Silveira Rodrigues

SES PE, Recife, Brazil

C

Conceição Cardozo

SES PE, Recife, Brazil

C

Candice LIMA Santos

IMIP SES/PE, Recife, Brazil

C

Carla Rameri Alexandre Silva De Azevedo

Instituto de Medicina Integral Prof. Fernando Figueira-IMIP, Brazilian Group of Gynecological Oncology (EVA), Recife, Brazil

M

Mozart Julio Tabosa Sales

SES PE imip, Recife, Brazil

C

Carolina Bezerra Patriota

IMIP, Recife, Brazil

R

Rosalva Raimundo Silva

FIOCRUZ IMIP, Recife, Brazil