Analysis of phase II study of cabozantinib (Cabo) with nivolumab (Nivo) and ipilimumab (Ipi) in advanced renal cell carcinoma with divergent histologies (RCCdh).
Abstract
4539 Background: We previously reported on treatment intensification with the combination of Cabo/Nivo/Ipi in 39 patients (pts) with metastatic RCCdh in a multi-center single arm phase II trial with a starting cabozantinib dose of 40 mg/day (d). Clinical utility was limited with an objective response rate (ORR) of 21% and significant treatment related adverse events (TrAEs) (77% ≥Grade 3 TrAEs). Therefore, we explored the safety and potential efficacy by using a lower starting dose of cabozantinib of 20 mg/d (NCT04413123). Methods: Eligible pts had metastatic RCCdh with ECOG performance status of 0-1 and may have received one line of prior therapy excluding immunotherapy or Cabo. Pts underwent a baseline biopsy and received Nivo 3 mg/kg and Ipi 1 mg/kg intravenously Q3 weeks (W) for 4 cycles followed by Nivo 480 mg IV Q4W. Cabo was given continuously at a dose of 20 mg/d; reductions to 20 mg every other day were allowed; after completion of Ipi, the Cabo dose could be increased to 40 mg/d. The primary endpoint was ORR by RECIST 1.1. Safety was a secondary endpoint. A one-stage design with 20 subjects (for 7 or more responses) would provide 75% power to distinguish an ORR of 40% versus 20% at one-sided alpha of 0.1. Results: 20 pts were enrolled and received at least 1 study drug at 7 sites from Feb. 2023 to Apr. 2024. Following histologic subtypes were included: papillary (n = 11), chromophobe (n = 1), translocation (n = 3), unclassified RCC (n = 2) and other (n = 3). 4 (20%) pts received prior systemic therapy. 10 (50%) pts received all 4 doses of Nivo and Ipi; 13 (65%) pts received maintenance nivolumab. Cabo was increased to 40 mg in 11/13 of these patients. Median follow-up was 9.4 (range 4.6-17.7) months. ORR was 25% (5/20, two-sided 80% CI, 13-41%, Table 1). 6- and 12-month progression free survival rates were 65% and 42% respectively. 11 (55%) pts developed grade 3 or 4 TrAEs (6 were due to elevation in liver function tests) and 1 (5%) had grade 5 TrAE (intraoperative hemorrhage) in setting of disease progression. 5 (25%) required high dose steroids (≥40 mg prednisone or equivalent) of which only 3 (15%) received for hepatitis. All therapy was discontinued due to toxicity in 1 (5%) pt. Conclusions: Although the study did not reach the target of 7 responses to uphold the alternative hypothesis, reduction of the starting dose of Cabo to 20 mg/d in combination with Nivo/Ipi results in numerically lower ≥ grade 3 TrAEs than starting at 40 mg/d (60% vs 77%) and clinical activity in a subset of patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04413123 . Total (N=20) Histology Prior Systemic Therapy N(%) Papillary Chromophobe Translocation Unclassified RCC Other No Yes PR 5 (25) 2 1 0 2 0 4 1 SD 8 (40) 5 0 2 0 1 7 1 PD 7 (35) 4 0 1 0 2 5 2 PR=partial response, SD=stable disease, PD=progressive disease.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (12)
Bradley Alexander McGregor
Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Morgan Paul
3Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Department of Data Science, Boston, United States
Wanling Xie
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Wenxin Xu
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Stephanie A. Berg
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA
Mehmet Asim Bilen
From the Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda (A.B.A., N.S., S.N., L.L., L.C.), the Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore (J.H.-C.), and the Investigational Drug Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville (H.S., E.S.) — all in Maryland; the Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (K.V.B., M.O., C.M., G.P.B.); AdventHealth Cancer Institute and the University of Central Florida, Orlando (G.S.); Dana–Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston (S.B., B.M.); UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill (W.Y.K.), and Duke University Medical Center and Duke Cancer Institute, Durham (J.H., S.H.) — both in North Carolina; the University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood (R.P.); Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York (M.Y.T., M.J.M., J.E.R.), and Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo (G.C.) — both in...
David A. Braun
Tian Zhang
Division of Hematology‐Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas Texas USA
Rana R. McKay
Department of Medicine, Urology, and Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences University of California‐San Diego La Jolla California USA
Hans J. Hammers
UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
David F. McDermott
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston Massachusetts USA
Toni K. Choueiri
Department of Medical Oncology Dana‐Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA