Analysis of macroscopic cracks in triple cation perovskite films fabricated by the anisole antisolvent method
Abstract
The most efficient perovskite solar cells (PSCs) are currently developed using antisolvent-based fabrication technology. Despite extensive analysis of various aspects of the antisolvent method—such as the type of antisolvent, dropping time, and precursor compatibility—some antisolvents still produce uneven film surface morphology on centimeter-scale substrates. The decoupling of the relationship between local structural characteristics, such as grain boundaries and defects, and the optoelectronic performance of PSCs is currently one of the most highly regarded research issues in the field. In this study, we utilized high-resolution white light interferometry to characterize the morphological distributions of perovskite films from the center to edge, using anisole as an example of the antisolvent. We observed that macro cracks at the center of the film typically exhibit dense ridge morphology, while cracks toward the edges display a concave morphology. We analyze the stress mechanism by using EDS mapping and AFM in detail, attributing this phenomenon to the competitive attachment of 2D islands and boundaries for adatoms, which are influenced by changes in grain size. The devices at different locations were fabricated and their performance analyzed. Our findings indicate that these protruding cracks do not significantly affect the current and voltage of the photovoltaic device; however, concave cracks lead to a decrease in the device fill factor. We attribute this decrease to enhanced carrier recombination at the interface due to this morphology. This study provides valuable insights into the formation of perovskite film morphology under antisolvent treatment and the relationship between film local morphology and PSCs performance.
Article Details
Journal Info
The Journal of Chemical Physics
American Institute of Physics
Authors (17)
Zihong Cai
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Yafei Wang
Zuchong Zhao
School of Physics and Materials Science, Guangzhou University 2 , Guangzhou 510006,
Jiacai Liao
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Kai Ma
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics
Junyu Lin
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Zecheng Diao
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Si Ling
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University 3 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Yuanhang Ren
School of Physics and Materials Science, Guangzhou University 2 , Guangzhou 510006,
Weiwei Xing
Gongbin Tang
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Ji Ran
Chair for Emerging Electronic Technologies, TUD Dresden University of Technology 4 , Nöthnitzer Str. 61, 01187 Dresden,
Zhongwei Liang
School of Mechanical and Electric Engineering, Guangzhou University 1 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,
Jianhui Zhang
Tao Zou
Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences
Fan Zhang
Meicong Wang
School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangzhou University 3 , Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006,