Analysis of corticosteroid exposure on efficacy of tarlatamab in small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

T Ty Michael Moore (The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) C Courtney C. Cavalieri (Hunstman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) S Sabrina Cannon (Huntsman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) J Jessica Campaign Mauser (Huntsman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT) E Emma Jones A Amanda Cass (Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN) A Alexander Olinger (Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE) B Bryce Bortka (Saint Luke’s Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO) A Allison Schepers (Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI) J Jacob Hobbs (Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD) L Lauren Blackwell (Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC) K Kori Holman (Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN) S Sarah Blocker (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) D Diana Kim (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) C Chao Hui Huang (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) P Prakash C. Neupane (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS) S Sanjana Mullangi (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) M Manidhar Reddy Lekkala (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS) H Haoran Li (Zhejiang University , , 866 Yuhangtang Rd , ,) T Timothy J. Schieber (University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS)

Abstract

8088 Background: Tarlatamab, a delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3)-targeted bispecific T-cell engager, has shown meaningful activity in small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Immune-mediated toxicities such as cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are common with T-cell–redirecting therapies and frequently require corticosteroids or cytokine-directed agents like tocilizumab. The impact of lymphodepleting corticosteroid exposure on tarlatamab efficacy remains unclear. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with SCLC treated with tarlatamab from 2018–2025 across the University of Kansas and nine cancer centers included in the DLL3 PanTUMOR database. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) stratified by cumulative dexamethasone dose. Other endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), characterization of CRS and ICANS, and overall survival (OS). A cost analysis of dexamethasone versus tocilizumab was also conducted. Results: Among 143 tarlatamab-treated patients, dexamethasone use for CRS or ICANS did not reduce PFS or ORR compared with patients not receiving corticosteroids. Tocilizumab did not reduce steroid needs. Median dexamethasone dose was higher in patients treated with tocilizumab. Severe CRS/ICANS was associated with significantly shorter OS. Cost analysis demonstrates the significant cost savings using dexamethasone compared to tocilizumab for treatment of immune-mediated toxicities. Conclusions: Corticosteroid exposure did not compromise tarlatamab efficacy, supporting optimized toxicity management without diminishing antitumor activity of DLL3-targeted T-cell–redirecting therapies. Endpoints Total Number of Evaluable Patients Outcomes Median PFS of tarlatamab with cumulative steroid dose Arm 1: No dexArm 2: 1-40 mg of dexArm 3: 41+ mg of dex Arm 1: 66Arm 2: 42Arm 3: 16 Arm 1: 2.53 moArm 2: 4.70 moArm 3: 3.68 moHR=1.0295% CI: 0.73-1.42 p=0.31 ORR of tarlatamab with cumulative steroid doseArm 1: No dexArm 2: 1-40 mg of dexArm 3: 41+ mg of dex Arm 1: 55Arm 2: 34Arm 3: 11 Arm 1: 29.1%Arm 2: 47.1% Arm 3: 36.4% Comparison of ORR with CRS (any grade) versus without CRS CRS: 58No CRS: 60 CRS: 34.5%No CRS: 33.3% Comparison of ORR with ICANS (any grade) versus without ICANS ICANS: 33No ICANS: 85 ICANS: 36.4%No ICANS: 32.9% Did the use of tocilizumab result in lower cumulative steroid use No tocilizumab: 42Tocilizumab: 28 Median dex dose without tocilizumab: 10 mgMedian dex dose with tocilizumab: 35 mg Median OS with grade 3+ CRS or ICANS versus with grade 0-2 CRS/ICANS Grade 0-2: 133Grade 3+: 10 Grade 0-2: 11.37 moGrade 3+: 4.19 moHR=0.3495% CI: 0.15-0.76p=0.006 Cost analysis for dex versus tocilizumabAverage wholesale price: tocilizumab $165,724, $3.13 dex10 mg CRS: 7237 doses of tocilizumab 37 doses of tocilizumab substituted with 37 dex 10 mg doses would have saved $173,962

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 8088-8088
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (20)

T

Ty Michael Moore

The University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

C

Courtney C. Cavalieri

Hunstman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

S

Sabrina Cannon

Huntsman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

J

Jessica Campaign Mauser

Huntsman Cancer Institute at The University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

E

Emma Jones

A

Amanda Cass

Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

A

Alexander Olinger

Nebraska Medicine, Omaha, NE

B

Bryce Bortka

Saint Luke’s Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

A

Allison Schepers

Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI

J

Jacob Hobbs

Avera Cancer Institute, Sioux Falls, SD

L

Lauren Blackwell

Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC

K

Kori Holman

Methodist University Hospital, Memphis, TN

S

Sarah Blocker

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

D

Diana Kim

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

C

Chao Hui Huang

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

P

Prakash C. Neupane

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, KS

S

Sanjana Mullangi

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

M

Manidhar Reddy Lekkala

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS

H

Haoran Li

Zhejiang University , , 866 Yuhangtang Rd , ,

T

Timothy J. Schieber

University of Kansas Cancer Center, Westwood, KS