An open label randomized non-inferiority trial comparing adjuvant platinum plus paclitaxel to platinum plus 5-FU after curative resection in high-risk penile carcinoma.
Abstract
LBA5012 Background: There is limited evidence to guide adjuvant therapy in high-risk penile cancer. Methods: Patients with high-risk penile cancer [> 1 inguinal lymph node (LN), perinodal extension, pelvic LN, or LN > 4 cm] who underwent curative resection were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 cycles of platinum plus 5-FU (PF arm) or platinum plus paclitaxel (PP arm), followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), toxicities and quality of life (QoL). The study was approved by IEC and registered with CTRI. Recruitment began in March 2017 but closed prematurely due to slow accrual. Results: Between March 2017 and October 2024, 49 patients were randomized (Table 1). Median follow-up was 60.1 months. There was no significant difference in median PFS (12.5 vs 35.9 months, p=0.460), 5-year PFS (36.1% vs 38.5%), median OS (21.6 vs 37.2 months, p=0.530) and 5-year OS (45.3% vs 41.1%) between PF and PP arm, respectively. Dose reductions were higher (33.3% vs 4.5%, p=0.015), similar dose delays (33.3% vs 31.8%, p=0.916) and a non-significant increase in drug discontinuation (42.9% vs 18.2%, p=0.078) in the PF arm. Grade 3/4 hematological (28.6% vs 4.5%, p=0.033) and gastrointestinal (33.3% vs 4.5%, p=0.015) toxicities were higher in PF arm. Infections (9.5% vs 13.6%, p=0.674) and hospitalizations (38.1% vs 18.2%, p=0.146) were similar. QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and MSHQ) analysis showed no difference in global health status (p=0.094), functional and symptom scales. Patients in PF arm reported more erectile dysfunction-related bother (p=0.018) while other MSHQ domains were similar. Conclusion: Adjuvant platinum plus 5-FU showed similar efficacy to platinum plus paclitaxel in high-risk penile carcinoma after curative resection, albeit with higher hematological and gastrointestinal toxicities, as well as erectile dysfunction-related bother. Clinical trial information: CTRI/2016/12/007567 . Baseline and treatment details. Characteristics 5-FU + Platinum(N = 25) Paclitaxel + Platinum(N = 24) p-value Age (years) Median (Range) 49 (29-70) 51 (26-70) Co-morbidities Hypertension 5 (20%) 5 (20.8%) 0.942 Diabetes Mellitus 5 (20%) 4 (16.7%) 0.763 Coronary Artery Disease 3 (12%) 1 (4.2%) 0.317 Prior phimosis 3 (12%) 1 (4.2%) 0.317 Smoker or smokeless tobacco 9 (36%) 10 (41.7%) 0.773 ECOG PS 0.715 0 2 (8%) 1 (4.2%) 1 21 (84%) 22 (91.6%) 2 2 (8%) 1 (4.2%) Surgery 0.995 Glansectomy 4 (16%) 4 (16.7%) Partial penectomy 17 (68%) 16 (66.6%) Total penectomy 4 (16%) 4 (16.7%) Degree of differentiation 0.566 Grade 1 2 (8%) 2 (8.3%) Grade 2 12 (48%) 8 (33.3%) Grade 3 11 (44%) 14 (58.3%) Pathological T stage 0.525 T1 10 (40%) 6 (25%) T2 8 (32%) 9 (37.5%) T3 7 (28%) 9 (37.5%) Pathological N stage 0.950 N2 4 (16%) 4 (16.7%) N3 21 (84%) 20 (8.3%) LVI or PNI 11 (44%) 9 (37.5%) 0.644 > 3 adjuvant cycles 15 (60%) 22 (91.6%) 0.010 Completed CTRT 12 (48%) 14 (58.3%) 0.469
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Aditya Dhanawat
ACTREC, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Vanita Noronha
Kumar Prabhash, MD, DM, MBBS, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India, Department of Medical Oncology, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur, India; Vanita Noronha, MD, DM, MBBS, Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India; Akash Pawar, MSc, Department of Statistics, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Mumbai, India, Ankush Shetake, MSc, Department of Statistics, Homi Bhabha Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Muzaffarpur, India; and Rajendra Badwe, MS, Department of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Nandini Sharrel Menon
Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Minit Jalan Shah
Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
Vijay Maruti Patil
Hinduja Hospital, Mumbai, India
Amit Joshi
Sr. Specialist, Department of Forensic Medicine, Government Medical College, Kota, Rajasthan, India
Gagan Prakash
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Mahendra Pal
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Amandeep Arora
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Ankit Misra
Department of Surgery, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Supriya Goud
Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India
Sucheta Bhagwan More
Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
Akanksha Yadav
Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
Vedang Murthy
Tata Memorial Hospital and Advanced Center for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer Homi Bhabha National Institute Mumbai India
Priyamvada Maitre
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Santosh Menon
Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Palak Popat
Nilesh Sable
Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, India
Archi Agrawal
ACTREC and TMH, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
Kumar Prabhash
Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Adult Solid Tumor Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India