An open-label, Phase 2 study of dapolsertib (MEN1703, SEL24) as monotherapy and in combination with glofitamab in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma
Abstract
Abstract Aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas represent a clinically heterogeneous group of malignancies characterized by rapid progression and varied molecular features. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and encompasses a biologically diverse group of diseases, now classified into 18 molecular subtypes (Alaggio et al. Leukemia, 2022). While first-line R-CHOP therapy cures approximately 60% of patients (Coiffier et al. N Engl J Med. 2002), those with relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease face poor outcomes. Although CAR T-cell therapies (e.g. axicabtagene ciloleucel, tisagenlecleucel, lisocabtagene maraleucel) have improved outcomes, access remains limited due to logistical and disease-related constraints (Locke et al. N Engl J Med. 2022). More recently, bispecific CD20xCD3 antibodies such as epcoritamab and glofitamab have shown clinical activity in the R/R setting after ≥2 prior lines, with complete response (CR) rates of ~40% (Dickinson et al. N Engl J Med. 2022; Thieblemont et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023). However, treatment sequencing and mechanisms of resistance to CD20-targeted therapies remain areas of active investigation. One emerging resistance mechanism to CD20 bispecific antibodies is the downregulation or loss of CD20 expression, which has been associated with treatment failure and disease progression (Bannard et al. Clin. Cancer Research, 2022). This highlights the need for novel strategies to overcome CD20 resistance. Dapolsertib (MEN1703) is a first-in-class dual PIM/FLT3 kinase inhibitor that targets key oncogenic and survival pathways in hematologic malignancies. PIM kinases (PIM1, PIM2, PIM3) regulate translation, metabolism, apoptosis, and immune modulation. Overexpression and mutations in PIM genes are associated with poor prognosis in DLBCL, particularly in the ABC subtype, and are known to cooperate with MYC and BCL6 (Szydłowski et al. Cancer Res. 2021). Simultaneous inhibition of all three PIMs downregulates MYC and induces marked cytotoxicity in preclinical models. In AML, dapolsertib has demonstrated preliminary clinical single-agent activity, with ~10% CR/CRi reported in the DIAMOND study (NCT03008187; Martinelli et al. Blood Neoplasia, in press). Dapolsertib has also shown strong antitumor activity in lymphoma models, both in vitro and in vivo (Bellon et al. Mol Cancer. 2023). Notably, dapolsertib demonstrated synergy with anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, providing a rationale for combination strategies (Szydłowski et al. Cancer Res. 2021). The rationale for combining dapolsertib with a CD20 bispecific antibody lies in its potential to modulate survival pathways, sensitize malignant B-cells to immunotherapy, and circumvent resistance mechanisms such as CD20 loss by inducing CD20 expression. JASPIS-01 (NCT06534437) is an ongoing, international multicenter, Phase 2 study evaluating dapolsertib as monotherapy or in combination with glofitamab in patients with R/R aggressive B-cell lymphoma after ≥2 prior lines of therapy. The trial consists of three parts: a safety run-in (Part 1), optional enrichment (Part 2), and a potential randomized comparison vs. glofitamab (Part 3). Part 1 will include 2 groups of patients. Group 1 comprises bispecific-naïve patients randomized to a prospective dose-optimization evaluation of the combination with dapolsertib. Patients receive either 125 mg on a 2 weeks on / 1 week off schedule or 150 mg on a 1 week on / 2 weeks off schedule for up to 12 cycles to investigate optimal therapeutic window. Group 2 comprises patients who exhausted therapeutic standard options and who will receive dapolsertib monotherapy at 125 mg on a 2 weeks on / 1 week off schedule until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The initial safety run-in (Parts 1 of both groups) informs dose selection for Part 2. Dose continuation in Part 2 will be guided by Data and Safety Monitoring Board safety assessments after ≥2 completed treatment cycles. The primary objectives are to assess safety, tolerability, and preliminary anti-lymphoma activity. Key endpoints include incidence of adverse events, overall/complete response rates, and duration of response. As of July 11, 2025, Part 1 is enrolling in France, Poland, Spain and the UK with additional sites activation ongoing.
Article Details
Authors (20)
Hervé Ghesquieres
Hopital Lyon Sud, Claude Bernard Lyon 1 University, Pierre-Benite, France
Malgorzata Krawczyk-Kulis
2Narodowy Instytut Onkologii im. Marii Skłodowskiej Curie, Gliwice, Poland
Dominik Chraniuk
11Hematology Ward, Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera, Torun, Poland
Michal Kwiatek
2AIDPORT Clinical Trials Hospital, Skorzewo, Poland
Hendrik Nogai
8Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Chadi Saba
8Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Adam Falkowski
5Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Katarzyna Kucharz
5Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Michal Kulesza
5Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Ruth Curley
5Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Gary Wilkinson
8Ryvu Therapeutics, Kraków, Poland
Przemyslaw Juszczynski
6Instytut Hematologii i Transfuzjologii, Zakład Hematologii Eksperymentalnej, Warsaw, Poland
Francesco Bertoni
Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland
Daniela Bellarosa
8Menarini Group, Pomezia, Rome, Italy
Antonio Galleu
20Menarini Group, Florence, Italy
Ira Gupta
10Menarini Group, New York, United States
Monika Dlugosz-Danecka
11MSK National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland
Wojciech Jurczak
Guillaume Cartron
CHU Montpellier UMR5535, Montpellier, France
Grzegorz Nowakowski
1Mayo Clinic, Rochester, United States