An international phase III randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial comparing duloxetine and pregabalin for opioid-refractory neuropathic cancer pain.
Abstract
12013 Background: Management of neuropathic cancer pain (NCP) refractory to standard-dose opioids remains a major clinical challenge, and direct comparative evidence between adjuvant analgesics is limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of duloxetine and pregabalin in patients with opioid-refractory NCP. Methods: We conducted an international, multicenter, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Adult cancer patients who continued to experience pain despite opioid analgesia were eligible to participate if they met the International Association for the Study of Pain criteria for neuropathic pain and had a Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Item 3 (worst pain in the past 24 hours) score of ≥4. Inpatients and outpatients from Japan and Australia were randomized at a ratio of 1:1 to the duloxetine group (D group) or the pregabalin group (P group). The study drugs were titrated up to duloxetine 60mg daily or pregabalin 150mg twice daily until day 14 (D14). The primary endpoint was BPI item 3 at D14. Secondary endpoints included the change in BPI item 3 from baseline at D14, and the proportion of patients achieving ≥1 points, ≥2 points, ≥30% and ≥50% pain reduction. The primary endpoint was analyzed using a two-sided Student’s T-test (α=0.05) under the intention-to-treat principle. A sample size of 64 patients per group was estimated to detect a mean difference of 1.0 (SD 2.0) with 80% power. Results: Between February 2020 and June 2025, 147 patients were enrolled across 18 institutions. Baseline BPI item 3 scores were similar between the D and P groups (7.23 vs 7.04). At D14, mean scores were 5.62 and 5.45, with no significant difference (P=0.70), corresponding to mean reductions of 1.57 and 1.55, respectively. Rates of pain reduction (≥1 point, ≥2 points, ≥30%, ≥50%) were similar between groups (D: 53/45/36/25% vs P: 50/36/26/19%). Grade ≥2 adverse events included decreased appetite (29%), nausea (21%), fatigue (20%), in the D group, and constipation (23%), decreased appetite (16%), dizziness/fatigue (12%), in the P group. Conclusions: No significant difference in analgesic efficacy was observed between duloxetine and pregabalin in patients with opioid-refractory NCP. The magnitude of pain reduction exceeded the mean NRS change typically associated with placebo (approximately 0.5–1.0 points), and the response rates for ≥50% pain reduction were substantially higher than the ≈3% reported for placebo in a prior NCP study. The estimated numbers needed to treat were low (4.6 for duloxetine and 6.3 for pregabalin) and were smaller than those reported in non-cancer neuropathic pain, suggesting comparable or potentially greater efficacy. However, given the relatively high incidence of adverse events and the distinct adverse event profiles of each drug, careful and individualized treatment selection balancing efficacy and tolerability is warranted. Clinical trial information: jRCTs051190097.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
Hiromichi Matsuoka
National Cancer Center Japan, Tokyo, Japan
Jessica Lee
Shunsuke Oyamada
Keisuke Ariyoshi
Department of Data Management, Japanese Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (JORTC) Data Center, Tokyo, Japan
Charmain Strauss
IMPACCT Trials Coordination Centre (ITCC) IMPACCT, Faculty of Health University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Belinda Fazekas
Flinders University, Daw Park, Australia
Shota Kobayashi
JORTC Data Center, Tokyo, Japan
Katherine Clark
Department of Molecular Genetics, The Ohio State University
Eriko Satomi
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroto Ishiki
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Takaomi Kessoku
Hideaki Hasuo
Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
Ryo Morita
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Akita Kousei Medical Center, Akita, Japan
Takahiro Higashibata
University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Yoshinobu Matsuda
Akira Inoue
Yoshihisa Matsumoto
Yasuhito Fujisaka
Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Meera Ruth Agar
University of Sydney and Sydney Cancer Centre, Ultimo, Australia
David Christopher Currow
College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA, Australia