An immunometabolic companion biomarker to enhance FDG-PET interpretation and guide frontline therapy in follicular lymphoma

R Ricky Nelles (2University of Queensland, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia) M Mark Meerson (1BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, United States) S Soi Law (1Mater Research Institute-UQ, Brisbane, Australia) V Venkata Chikatamarla (4Gold Coast University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Southport, Australia) G Greg Hapgood (10Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Haematology, Brisbane, Australia) T Tara Cochrane (3Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia) T Tsz Hung Tong (5Gold Coast University Hospital, Department of Haematology, Southport, Australia) J Jane Royle (13Townsville Hospital, Department of Haematology, Townsville, Australia) A Anna Johnston (12Royal Hobart Hospital, Department of Haematology, Hobart, Australia) K Kate Manos (14Flinders Medical Centre, Department of Haematology, Bedford Park, Australia) Y Yiyang Chen A Allison Barraclough (12Department of Haematology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia) C Chan Cheah (20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia) E Eliza Hawkes (1Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia) G Georgina Hodges (10Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Haematology, Brisbane, Australia) J Jake Shortt (6Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia) R Ross Salvaris (12Monash Health and Monash University, Department of Haematology, Melbourne, Australia) E Elizabeth Goodall (12Monash Health and Monash University, Department of Haematology, Melbourne, Australia) D Dipti Talaulikar (19Canberra Health Services, Haematology Unit, ACT Pathology, Canberra, Australia) J Judith Trotman K Kirk Morris (21Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Haematology, Brisbane, Australia) N Naadir Gutta (22Department of Haematology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Australia) P Paolo Strati K Kirill Kriukov E Elizaveta Kozlova (3BostonGene, Waltham, United States) A Alisa Sadekova (3BostonGene, Waltham, United States) M Maria Sotova (3BostonGene, Waltham, United States) A Arina Tkachuk E Ekaterina Postovalova N Nathan Fowler (39Department of Hematology and Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX) M Maher Gandhi (2University of Queensland, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia) J Joshua Tobin (2University of Queensland, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia)

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Bendamustine-based immunochemotherapy (ICT) is a standard frontline regimen for follicular lymphoma (FL) but has limited efficacy in high-grade lymphomas characterised by rapid B cell proliferation. In clinical practice, Standardized Uptake Value (SUVmax) on pre-treatment PET is often interpreted as a surrogate for proliferative activity to guide the use of bendamustine, although evidence for this practice is conflicting (Mir et al, Blood, 2020). The inconsistent prognostic impact of pre-treatment SUVmax in FL may be explained by ex vivo studies demonstrating that the SUV reflects glucose uptake, not only of malignant B cells, but also by intratumoral T cells (Nath et al, Blood Adv, 2021). Thus, there is a need for an ‘immunometabolic’ companion biomarker to refine PET interpretation and identify FL subsets that may benefit from alternative ICT to bendamustine. Methods: A retrospective, real-world cohort of treatment-naive FL patients was assembled from 13 academic institutions across Australia. Baseline PET indices (Standardized Uptake Value [SUVmax], Total Metabolic Tumour Volume [TMTV]) were reported centrally and clinical and laboratory characteristics collected. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bulk RNA sequencing (RNAseq) were performed on diagnostic nodal specimens. Immune cell proportions within the lymphoma microenvironment (LME) were quantified using RNASeq cell deconvolution and LME subtyping performed. B cell functional gene expression signatures (fGES) were curated using non-overlapping gene signatures expressed in purified B cell populations (centroblast “CB”, centrocyte “CC”, memory B cell “MBC”). Log-rank test was used to assess prognostic significance of variables. Spatial proteomic analysis used the Akoya PhenoCycler-Fusion platform, applying a custom 55-protein immunometabolic panel including markers of glucose uptake (GLUT1). Cellular phenotypes were determined using fluorescent marker profiles. Community analysis was performed using a graph neural network, integrating cell types with spatial architecture. Results: 129 bendamustine ICT treated patients were included between 2003 and 2021. Median follow-up was 46.4 months. Median age was 61 years and 62 (48%) had high-risk FLIPI. The median PFS was 136.8 months and 14 (11%) experienced POD24 events. Progression free survival (PFS) did not differ based on clinical PET indices, SUVmax >12 (43%, p=0.59) or TMTV >510cm3 (27%, p=0.069). A high centroblast (CBhigh) score (59.4%), was a strong predictor of inferior PFS (HR 2.51 95% CI 1.29–4.87; p <0.01) and POD24/histological transformation (HT) events (OR 4.03, p=0.03). The sensitivity and specificity for HT following bendamustine ICT was 88.9% and 63.9% respectively. CBhighwas associated with higher Ki67 (30% vs 15%, p<0.001) and grade 3a FL (p=0.014) on histopathology. The CBhigh subset was associated with a depleted LME (p<0.001) including reduction in CD4 helper (p<0.001), follicular helper (p<0.001) and CD8 T cells (p=0.03). There was no association with individual mutations or translocations by NGS. LME subtyping and CC and MBC fGES were not significantly associated with PFS. On multivariate analysis adjusting for grade, Ki67, and SUVmax, CBhigh remained significant for PFS (HR 3.31, p=0.012). A combined model of CBhigh and SUVmax further improved prognostic accuracy (p=0.005). Specifically in patients with SUVmax>12, CBhigh was associated with significantly shorter PFS than the CBlow group, in whom no early treatment failure events occurred(4yr PFS 48% vs 100%, p<0.001). Spatial analysis identified 20 unique cellular communities. Concordant with the RNASeq findings, communities enriched in FL B cells within intrafollicular (p<0.05) and marginal zone (p<0.01) regions were more frequent in high SUVmax cases. In these communities, FL B cells demonstrated increased GLUT1 expression (p<0.001) and Ki67 (p=0.014) compared with low SUVmax cases, consistent with high glucose utilisation and proliferation. Conclusion: While often applied in clinical practice, pre-treatment SUVmax alone is an unreliable predictor of response to bendamustine ICT. We demonstrate that a CBhigh FL subset, marked by proliferative malignant B cells and a depleted LME, is highly prognostic in bendamustine ICT treated FL patients. This tissue-based biomarker is independent of and additive to SUVmax, and should be tested prospectively for its ability to inform personalised frontline treatment decisions in FL.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5338-5338
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (32)

R

Ricky Nelles

2University of Queensland, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia

M

Mark Meerson

1BostonGene Corporation, Waltham, United States

S

Soi Law

1Mater Research Institute-UQ, Brisbane, Australia

V

Venkata Chikatamarla

4Gold Coast University Hospital, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Southport, Australia

G

Greg Hapgood

10Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Haematology, Brisbane, Australia

T

Tara Cochrane

3Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Australia

T

Tsz Hung Tong

5Gold Coast University Hospital, Department of Haematology, Southport, Australia

J

Jane Royle

13Townsville Hospital, Department of Haematology, Townsville, Australia

A

Anna Johnston

12Royal Hobart Hospital, Department of Haematology, Hobart, Australia

K

Kate Manos

14Flinders Medical Centre, Department of Haematology, Bedford Park, Australia

Y

Yiyang Chen

A

Allison Barraclough

12Department of Haematology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Australia

C

Chan Cheah

20Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Australia

E

Eliza Hawkes

1Olivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Heidelberg, Australia

G

Georgina Hodges

10Princess Alexandra Hospital, Department of Haematology, Brisbane, Australia

J

Jake Shortt

6Australasian Leukemia and Lymphoma Group, Melbourne, Australia

R

Ross Salvaris

12Monash Health and Monash University, Department of Haematology, Melbourne, Australia

E

Elizabeth Goodall

12Monash Health and Monash University, Department of Haematology, Melbourne, Australia

D

Dipti Talaulikar

19Canberra Health Services, Haematology Unit, ACT Pathology, Canberra, Australia

J

Judith Trotman

K

Kirk Morris

21Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Department of Haematology, Brisbane, Australia

N

Naadir Gutta

22Department of Haematology, Mater Hospital, Brisbane, Australia

P

Paolo Strati

K

Kirill Kriukov

E

Elizaveta Kozlova

3BostonGene, Waltham, United States

A

Alisa Sadekova

3BostonGene, Waltham, United States

M

Maria Sotova

3BostonGene, Waltham, United States

A

Arina Tkachuk

E

Ekaterina Postovalova

N

Nathan Fowler

39Department of Hematology and Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

M

Maher Gandhi

2University of Queensland, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia

J

Joshua Tobin

2University of Queensland, Mater Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia