An immune-therapeutic salvage strategy for ‘functional’ high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) incorporating iberdomide, isatuximab, and dexamethasone – the IBIS study amarc 20-01.

S Sueh-Li Lim (4Monash University, Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Melbourne, Australia) S Sridurga Mithraprabhu (2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) J John Reynolds (Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) W Wojciech Janowski (3Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia) N Noemi Horvath (4Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia) H Hang Quach (University of Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia) P Philip Campbell (7University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia) G Georgia McCaughan (8St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia) Y Yu Jin Kim T Thalia Peres Suarez (2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia) S Sophie Lee (9Western Health, Melbourne, Australia) P Phillip Wong (10Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia) B Byard Nina (11Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium, Alfred health, Melbourne, Australia) P Priyanka Meet (11Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium, Alfred health, Melbourne, Australia) K Khoa Le (11Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium, Alfred health, Melbourne, Australia) A Andrew Spencer

Abstract

Abstract Background: Approximately 20% of NDMM patients (pts) demonstrate early therapeutic resistance, manifesting as primary refractoriness (1REF) to 1st-line therapy (1L) or early progression (EP) despite optimal induction therapy ± ASCT and lenalidomide maintenance. Most of these pts do not exhibit diagnostic high-risk cytogenetics/FISH, precluding a risk-adapted approach to therapy and underscoring the need for genomic analysis to enhance risk-stratification. Classified as functional high-risk (FHR) disease, these pts have unacceptably short OS, median 16.9 vs 78.2 months (mos) for pts progressing <12 vs >12 mos from 1L (p<0.001) (unpublished, ANZ MRDR landmark analysis). This impact persists even after redefining FHR MM as EP≤18 mos of 1L therapy (post-hoc analysis of the CASTOR trial), highlighting an ongoing unmet need for effective therapies for FHR MM. Methods: The Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium (AMaRC) IBIS trial (ACTRN12621001037897) combines iberdomide (IB), isatuximab (IS) and dexamethasone (DEX) salvage for 50 FHR pts relapsing ≤18 months of 1L: IB 1.6mg PO D1-21, IS 10mg/kg IV D1,8,15,22 of cycle 1 and 2-weekly thereafter and DEX 40mg D1,8,15,22 (20mg, age>70 years) of each 28-day cycle to PD. Primary objective is to establish ORR and safety at end of cycle (EOC) 12. We present the second pre-specified, interim analysis of this endpoint of 29 evaluable pts defined as having either ≥12 months of follow-up or those who withdrew from study earlier. To understand the underlying genomics, we performed low-coverage whole genome sequencing (LC-WGS) and targeted amplicon sequencing (TAS) of MM-specific genes from circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to quantify tumour fraction (TF), copy number alterations and mutational spectrum. Bioinformatic analysis was conducted using ichorCNA for LC-WGS data to derive TF estimates while TAS analysis is ongoing with a custom QIAseq library kit and validated bioinformatic pipeline. Results: 51 pts were enrolled prior to 27MAY2025; one pt withdrew prior to receiving study drug. As of 25JUN2025, 29/50 pts are evaluable – 51.7% males, median age 65.4 years (43.1-81.7), 24.1% R-ISS III at diagnosis. Of 50 pts: 28%, 32%, 16%, 12% with 0, 1, 2 or 3 high-risk chromosomal abnormalities respectively; 34% fulfilling IMS2025 high-risk criteria, 54% standard-risk and 12% in whom diagnostic CG/FISH were omitted, 83% received PI-IMID 1L (76% VRd, 3% VRd+chemotherapy, 7% VRd+Selinexor), 10% bortezomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone (VCD), 7% lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd), 24% ASCT; 10% 1REF to 1L and 90% relapsed after initial response to 1L, of these 72% had ³PR to 1L. Median time from 1L to IBIS salvage was 6.3 months (1.6 – 19.2). For the primary endpoint, of the 29 evaluable patients, 20 achieved best response ≥PR, ORR 69.0% (95%CrI 50.3-82.6%). Posterior probability that the true ORR rate >40% is 99.9% and thus protocol-specific proof of concept (POC) criteria continued to be met. In those with ≥PR (N=20), response was rapid, 95% by EOC3. Of 29, 15 remain alive and progression-free, 8 alive with confirmed PD and 6 dead: 5 myeloma-related deaths and 1 due to infection. Preliminary estimates of PFS and OS at 9 months are 51% and 82% respectively. To date in all pts, the 5 most common adverse events (AEs) were: neutropenia (54%; grd 3-4 52%), insomnia (36%; grd 3-4 8%), infusion-reaction (28%; grd 3-4 2%), upper respiratory tract infection (26%; grd 3-4 4%) and constipation (24%; no grd 3-4). Overall, 2 grd 5 events: lung infection and sepsis, 3 adverse events of special interest: 1 grd 3 infusion-reaction to isatuximab and 2 reports of squamous cell carcinoma. Preliminary analysis of ctDNA LC-WGS results were available for 49/50 pts (1 pt had an unevaluable sample). A TF was detected in 23/49 pts (46.9%, median=17.3% [5.3-82.8%]), with 18/23 pts exhibiting >10% TF and of which 5/18 showing a TF >50%. Of the 8/29 pts with PD, 6 had a TF (median=76% [59.6- 82.8%]). FISH, cytogenetic, and LC-WGS analyses revealed del(17p) in 30% of pts. LC-WGS identified MYC copy number gains in (12/49) 24% pts. Conclusion: In this second planned interim analysis, IB-IS-DEX was well-tolerated, achieved early disease control and demonstrated promising efficacy in FHR MM. Preliminary ctDNA genomic analyses highlight a substantial burden of adverse biology, with frequent del(17p), MYC copy number gains, and high cTF among pts with PD. Updates on survival will be presented at the conference.

Article Details

Journal Blood
Volume / Issue Vol. 146, Issue Supplement 1
Published November 03, 2025
Pages 5841-5841
ISSN 0006-4971
Publisher Elsevier BV

Journal Info

Blood

Elsevier BV

ISSN: 0006-4971 Health Sciences

Authors (16)

S

Sueh-Li Lim

4Monash University, Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Melbourne, Australia

S

Sridurga Mithraprabhu

2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

J

John Reynolds

Clinical Haematology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

W

Wojciech Janowski

3Calvary Mater Newcastle, Waratah, Australia

N

Noemi Horvath

4Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia

H

Hang Quach

University of Melbourne, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

P

Philip Campbell

7University Hospital Geelong, Geelong, Australia

G

Georgia McCaughan

8St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia

Y

Yu Jin Kim

T

Thalia Peres Suarez

2Australian Centre for Blood Diseases, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

S

Sophie Lee

9Western Health, Melbourne, Australia

P

Phillip Wong

10Toowoomba Hospital, Toowoomba, Australia

B

Byard Nina

11Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium, Alfred health, Melbourne, Australia

P

Priyanka Meet

11Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium, Alfred health, Melbourne, Australia

K

Khoa Le

11Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium, Alfred health, Melbourne, Australia

A

Andrew Spencer