Ampullary adenocarcinoma: What is the best approach? Insights from a large retrospective series.
Abstract
e16473 Background: Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AAC) is rare (~0.2% of gastrointestinal cancers), but is increasing in incidence. Knowledge about risk factors, diagnosis and optimal treatment of AAC is still limited. Methods: We conducteda retrospective analysis of patients (pts) diagnosed with AAC between January 2015 and December 2023. Baseline clinical and histopathological data were collected. We used a multivariable Cox regression model to test the prognostic impact of clinical and treatment-related variables. Results: A total of 106 pts were included with median age of 69 years (37–84), 58.5% (n = 62) male. ECOG performance status was ≤ 1 in 92.5% (n = 98) of cases. Localized disease was present in 96.2% (n = 102), with 28.3% (n = 30) stage I, 6.6% (n = 7) stage II, and 61.3% (n = 65) stage III. Adjuvant therapy was given to 47% (n = 48) of pts, with 39 pts receiving chemotherapy and 9 pts receiving chemoradiotherapy. Gemcitabine (n = 14) and capecitabine (n = 9) were the most used agents in adjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy, respectively. Median follow-up was 29.3 months (1–114). Recurrence occurred in 26.5% (n = 27), with a median time to recurrence of 25.7 months (1-113). Median recurrence-free survival (mRFS) was not reached ([NR], NR-NR) for pts undergoing curative surgery at diagnosis. There was no statistical difference in mRFS between the intestinal and pancreatobiliary subtypes (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, p = 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.7). Factors associated with lower mRFS in localized disease included T3-4 tumors (HR 3.2, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.4-7.1), N+ disease (HR 2.35, p = 0.031, 95%CI 1.1-5.3), lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (HR 2.45, p = 0.015, 95%CI 1.2-5.3),perineural invasion (PnI) (HR 2.9, p = 0.002, 95%CI 1.4-6.2), histological grade 3 (HR 2.7, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.4-5.6), and R1 resection (HR 4.06, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.9-8.9). Adjuvant therapy was not associated with a higher mRFS (HR 0.71, p = 0.35, 95%CI 0.4-1.5). Median overall survival (mOS) was not reached ([NR], NR-NR) for localized disease and was 13.6 (10.9-16.3) months for all-time stage IV disease, with 11.8 months for first line therapy and 5.9 months for second line. Worse mOS in pts with localized disease ab initio was associated with T3-T4 tumors (HR 3.28, p = 0.002, 95%CI 1.5-7.3), N+ disease (HR 2.4, p = 0.026, 95%CI 1.1-5.4), LVI and PnI (HR 2.7, p = 0.006, 95%CI 1.3-5.9 and HR 3.2, p < 0.001, 95%CI 1.5-6.6, respectively), histological grade 3 (HR 2.8, p = 0.003, 95%CI 1.3-5.7), R1 surgery (HR 3.4, p = 0.001, 95%CI 1.56-7.38). Conclusions: In this large series of pts diagnosed with AAC, adjuvant therapy did not seem to make a statistical difference in both mRFS and mOS. Size, N status, LVI, PnI, histological grade, and resection margin are significant prognostic factors and should guide treatment strategies. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and treatment strategies for prognosis.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (4)
Ivânia Furtado
Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Lisbon, Portugal
Nuno Gião
Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Lisbon, Portugal
Mariana Sardinha
Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Lisbon, Portugal
João Boavida Ferreira
Unidade Local de Saúde de São José, Lisbon, Portugal