Alliance A022101/NRG-GI009: A pragmatic randomized phase III trial evaluating total ablative therapy for patients with limited metastatic colorectal cancer—Evaluating radiation, ablation, and surgery (ERASur).

E Eric David Miller (The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) K Kathryn Hitchcock (University of Florida, Gainesville, FL) Q Qian Shi J Jesse G. Dixon (Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN) S Sepideh Gholami (Northwell Health Cancer Center, New Hyde Park, NY) S Sarah B. White (Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI) C Christina Wu (Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ) C Christopher C. Goulet (Billings Clinic Cancer Center, Billings, MT) K Kyung-Wook Jee (Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA) C Chadwick L. Wright (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH) R Rona Yaeger A Ardaman Shergill (Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago) T Theodore S. Hong (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) T Thomas J. George E Eileen M. O'Reilly (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY) J Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt P Paul Bernard Romesser (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY)

Abstract

TPS3634 Background: For patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC), aggressive local therapy of isolated metastases, particularly in the liver, has been associated with long-term progression-free and overall survival (OS) primarily based on retrospective evidence. However, in patients with limited metastatic CRC that is deemed inoperable or those with additional disease outside of the liver or lungs, the role of local ablative therapies, including microwave ablation (MWA) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), to render patients disease free is less clear. Despite the long history of treating oligometastatic CRC with local therapy, which is largely provider biased, questions remain regarding the benefit of extending the paradigm of metastatic directed therapy to patients with more extensive disease. This trial seeks to use a pragmatic multimodality approach that mirrors the current clinical dilemma. This study is designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding total ablative therapy (TAT) of all sites of disease to standard of care systemic treatment in those with limited metastatic CRC. Methods: A022101/NRG-GI009 is a National Clinical Trials Network randomized phase III study planned to enroll 364 patients with newly diagnosed metastatic CRC (BRAF wild-type, microsatellite stable) without peritoneal metastasis or liver-only disease on baseline imaging. Patients receive first-line systemic therapy for 12-39 weeks. Patients with ≤4 sites of metastatic disease following initial systemic therapy that are amenable to any combination of surgical resection, MWA, and/or SBRT are then randomized 1:1, stratified by number of metastatic organ sites (1-2 vs. 3-4), timing of metastatic disease diagnosis (de novo vs. secondary), and presence of metastatic disease outside the liver/lungs in at least 1 site. Patients in Arm 1 will receive TAT consisting of treatment of all metastatic sites with SBRT, MWA, and/or surgical resection followed by standard of care systemic therapy. Patients in Arm 2 will continue with standard of care systemic therapy alone. The primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints include event-free survival, treatment-related toxicities, and local recurrence with exploratory biomarker analyses. The study needs 346 evaluable patients combined in the 2 arms to demonstrate an improvement in OS with a hazard ratio of 0.7 to provide 80% power with a one-sided alpha of 5%. The trial utilizes a group sequential design with two interim analyses (25% and 50% of events) for futility. The trial activated in January 2023 and recruitment is ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG); Clinical trial information: NCT05673148 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2025
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

E

Eric David Miller

The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

K

Kathryn Hitchcock

University of Florida, Gainesville, FL

Q

Qian Shi

J

Jesse G. Dixon

Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

S

Sepideh Gholami

Northwell Health Cancer Center, New Hyde Park, NY

S

Sarah B. White

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

C

Christina Wu

Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ

C

Christopher C. Goulet

Billings Clinic Cancer Center, Billings, MT

K

Kyung-Wook Jee

Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA

C

Chadwick L. Wright

University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH

R

Rona Yaeger

A

Ardaman Shergill

Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology, Chicago

T

Theodore S. Hong

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

T

Thomas J. George

E

Eileen M. O'Reilly

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY

J

Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt

P

Paul Bernard Romesser

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY