Alirocumab plus cemiplimab in immuno-refractory metastatic NSCLC: A single-arm, multi-center, phase 2 study.

E Eziafa Oduah (Duke University, Durham, NC) A Andreas Nicholas Saltos (H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL) T Tom Stinchcombe (Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC) J Joel Rivera Concepcion (Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC) J Jeffrey Crawford J Jeffrey Melson Clarke (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) L Laura Alder (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) C Cameron Oswalt (Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC) S Steven Wolf (2Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, United States) S Sin-Ho Jung (1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States) K Kouros Owzar X Xiaodi Qin (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC) A Abbie Ireland (Duke University, Durham, NC) A Alan Chen L Liliana Lyniv (Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC) N Neal E. Ready (Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC) J Jhanelle E. Gray (Department of Thoracic Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa Florida USA) T Trudy G. Oliver S Scott Joseph Antonia (Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC)

Abstract

2619 Background: Immunotherapy resistance remains a significant unmet clinical need for most non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. PCSK9 was shown in preclinical models to mediate cancer immunotherapy resistance and may serve as a novel immuno-inhibitory target. Methods: This is a first-in-class, multi-center, single arm, phase II study evaluating the clinical activity and safety of the PCSK9 inhibitor, alirocumab, in combination with the anti-PD1 antibody cemiplimab, in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whose tumors were previously resistant to immune checkpoint blockade. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints were safety, progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and disease control rate (DCR). The correlative objective was to analyze the biomarkers of response. Results: A total of 60 patients were enrolled between May 2023 and August 2025. In the 58 evaluable patients, the estimated ORR for the two-stage design was 14.98% (90% CI, 5.45, 25.52). The median duration of response was not estimable. The median OS was 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.3 – 13.6). No new safety signals were seen. Non-hematologic adverse events (AEs) were more prevalent than hematologic AEs and were predominantly grade 2 or less. Two grade 3 events were seen. Biomarker analysis identified superior outcomes in NSCLC harboring PIK3CA, AKT1 , or PTEN alterations, with ORR of 31.5% (95% CI,13.9%, 68.4%,), significantly associating with response, p 0.0008 (two-sided, Fisher’s exact). No objective responses were observed in the absence of PIK3CA, PTEN or AKT1 alterations. Median OS was numerically longer in the altered group was 13.64 months (95% CI, 3.1 – NR) compared to 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.2-12.8) in the unaltered group. Analysis of the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) in NSCLC cohorts demonstrated a correlation between PIK3CA, PTEN and AKT1 expression and PCSK9 expression. Preclinical translational studies further elucidated the impact of PIK3CA, PTEN or AKT1 in intratumoral PCSK9 secretion, a novel immune-oncological finding for this pathway, and provided a biological rationale for the observed pattern of response. Conclusions: These findings provide clinical proof-of-principle that PCSK9 inhibition can overcome immunotherapy resistance in a subset of patients and suggest that PIK3CA/PTEN/AKT1 pathway may play a significant role in PCSK9 mediated immune evasion and could be a biomarker of response. These findings warrant further investigation in a larger confirmatory study. Clinical trial information: NCT05553834 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 2619-2619
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (19)

E

Eziafa Oduah

Duke University, Durham, NC

A

Andreas Nicholas Saltos

H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL

T

Tom Stinchcombe

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

J

Joel Rivera Concepcion

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

J

Jeffrey Crawford

J

Jeffrey Melson Clarke

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

L

Laura Alder

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

C

Cameron Oswalt

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

S

Steven Wolf

2Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Durham, United States

S

Sin-Ho Jung

1Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, United States

K

Kouros Owzar

X

Xiaodi Qin

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

A

Abbie Ireland

Duke University, Durham, NC

A

Alan Chen

L

Liliana Lyniv

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC

N

Neal E. Ready

Duke Cancer Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC

J

Jhanelle E. Gray

Department of Thoracic Oncology H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute Tampa Florida USA

T

Trudy G. Oliver

S

Scott Joseph Antonia

Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC