Alectinib in children and adolescents with solid or CNS tumors harboring ALK-fusions: A data update from the iMATRIX alectinib phase I/II open-label, multi-center study.
Abstract
10004 Background: Alectinib is a next generation oral inhibitor of ALK-fusion proteins, being investigated in children and adolescents with ALK-fusion bearing tumors at diagnosis or relapse. Here we present updated safety and efficacy data from the iMATRIX Alectinib phase I-II study (NCT04774718). Methods: Patients, less than 18 years of age, with ALK fusion-positive solid or CNS tumors for whom prior treatment had proven to be ineffective or for whom there was no satisfactory treatment available were eligible. Patients were recruited to Part 1 to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) and to monitor drug pharmacokinetics. Investigators reported Best Overall Response according to RANO (CNS tumors) or RECIST v1.1 (solid tumors) criteria with a data cut off of July 2024. Results: In total 22 patients with a median age of 8 years were enrolled. Fourteen patients were diagnosed with solid tumors: inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (n = 9), renal cell carcinoma (n = 2), mesothelioma (n = 1), nephroblastoma (n = 1), and atypical melanocytic tumor (n = 1). Six patients were diagnosed with CNS tumors: high grade glioma (n = 5) and pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (n = 1). Two patients had ineligible conditions: histiocytosis (n = 1) and anaplastic large cell lymphoma (n = 1). Among the 22 patients, 14 had not received prior systemic therapy. ALK fusion partners were EML4 and CLTC in 3 patients, TPM3 and KIF5C in 2 patients, and DCTN1, FN1, KIF5B, NPM, PPP1CB, STRN, CLIP1, RANBP2, ZEB2, PLEKHA7, CDC42BPB and HNRNPA3 in 1 patient each. In the 21 safety evaluable patients, only 1 DLT of Grade 3 increased alanine aminotransferase, in the context of multiple viral infections, was reported. The DLT resolved after treatment interruption and Alectinib was restarted at a reduced dose level, and then tolerated well. Eighteen patients (86%) experienced at least one Adverse Event (AE) reported as related to Alectinib, the majority being of Grade 1 and 2 severity. Grade ≥ 3 AEs related to alectinib were reported for 5 patients (23.8%) and there were 2 patients with serious AEs related to Alectinib. There were no new safety signals detected. Investigator reported Best Overall Response rate in 16 patients was 87.5%; (14 PRs) and 2 patients were reported to have stable disease. A partial response was observed in 5/5 evaluable patients with CNS tumors and in 9/11 evaluable patients with solid tumours. Six patients were excluded from the efficacy analysis due to ineligible tumor type (n = 2), not dosed (n = 1), no measurable disease according to RANO criteria (n = 1) or lack of response assessment by the analysis cut-off date (n = 2). Conclusions: Alectinib continues to have a favourable safety profile in pediatric patients. Despite this being a very challenging population to treat, clinical efficacy results are transformational with the majority of patients experiencing a tumor response. Clinical trial information: NCT04774718 .
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (20)
François Doz
Michela Casanova
Kyung-Nam Koh
Asan Medical Center Children’s Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
Karsten Nysom
Adela Canete
Unidad de Oncologia Pediatrica, Institute de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Hyoung Jin Kang
1Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University Children's Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Matthias A. Karajannis
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
Darren R. Hargrave
Nadege Corradini
Centre Léon Bérard, Department of Pediatric Oncology, Institut d'Hematologie et d'Oncologie Pédiatrique, Lyon, France
Yeming Wu
Huanmin Wang
David Simon Ziegler
Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Nicolas Prud'homme
Division of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Charles-Bruneau Cancer Center, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, Montreal, QC, Canada
Carla Manzitti
Quentin Campbell-Hewson
Great North Children's Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Carolina Sturm
F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland
Tao Xu
Dhruvitkumar S. Sutaria
Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA
Francis Mussai
16Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, United Kingdom
Amar J. Gajjar
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN