AI-based classification and outcome prediction in BCR::ABL1-like B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients using targeted RNA-seq
Abstract
Abstract Background Recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS) and transcriptomic profiling have refined the molecular classification of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (BCP-ALL), leading to the identification of novel subtypes with distinct biological features and clinical implications. Among these, the BCR::ABL1-like subtype is characterized by a stem/progenitor cell gene expression profile, poor response to conventional therapy, higher levels of measurable residual disease (MRD), and an increased risk of relapse. Accurate and timely classification of this subtype is crucial for therapeutic decision-making, including the use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and intensified treatment protocols.AimsOur primary objective was to develop artificial intelligence (AI) models that allow for rapid and automated classification of BCR::ABL1-like BCP-ALL patients using gene expression data obtained from our custom panel. In addition, we aimed to assess whether the combination of gene expression profiles and diagnostic clinical variables could be used to predict adverse outcomes, such as relapse or death, at diagnosis.MethodsRNA-seq data from 179 BCP-ALL patients were quantified using Salmon and normalized across samples. Normalized expression values were used to train predictive models. The dataset was randomly divided into training (80%) and test (20%) subsets. The BCR::ABL1-like subtype was encoded as 1; all other subtypes as 0. Clinical outcome (relapse and death) was available for a subset of 82 patients. Two machine learning (ML) strategies were applied: LightGBM (LGBM, Microsoft®) and a neural network (NN) built with Keras. Hyper-parameter tuning was performed for both models. Prediction accuracy was used to assess classification performance, and ROC_AUC variable (receiver operating characteristic - area under the curve) was used to evaluate outcome prediction, both measured on the test set. Feature importance and SHAP values were computed to interpret the LGBM models Results Both AI models demonstrated strong classification performance, with test set accuracies of 0.96 (LGBM) and 0.98 (NN). No overfitting was observed (training vs. test accuracy difference < 0.02). For outcome prediction, the LGBM model yielded ROC-AUC values of 0.68 (death) and 0.83 (relapse). The top genes associated with relapse (based on LGBM feature importance) were JCHAIN (8), CD99 (11), and SHOC2 (19). For death, the top features were SHOC2 (17), RBM47 (17), and LDB3 (14). SHAP analysis suggested a protective role for SHOC2 in both relapse (SHAP: –0.70) and death (–0.40), whereas RBM47 (+0.60) and LDB3 (+0.70) were associated with increased mortality risk. Summary/Conclusions AI models trained on targeted RNA-seq gene expression data can reliably classify BCR::ABL1-like BCP-ALL, supporting their potential role in rapid, automated molecular diagnosis. Additionally, baseline gene expression at diagnosis shows promise for predicting clinical outcomes, although larger cohorts are needed to improve prognostic model performance. Preliminary findings highlight SHOC2 as a potential protective biomarker for relapse and mortality in BCP-ALL, while RBM47, LDB3, and CD99 warrant further investigation as markers of poor prognosis.
Article Details
Authors (19)
Juan Manuel Rosa-Rosa
1Hospital 12 de Octubre, Hematología, Madrid, Spain
Jordi Ribera
Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute (IJC), Badalona, Spain
Mireia Morgades
Hematology Department. ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute (IJC), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
Isabel Granada
Hematology Department. ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute (IJC), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
Rosa Ayala Diaz
1Hospital 12 de Octubre, Hematología, Madrid, Spain
Susana Barrera
4Translational and Clinical Research Program, Cancer Research Center (IBMCC, CSIC – University of Salamanca); Cytometry Service, NUCLEUS;, Department of Medicine, University of Salamanca (Universidad de Salamanca), Salamanca, Spain
Alberto Hernández-Sánchez
Josgrey Del Valle Navas Acosta
6Hematology Department, Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, IBMCC, CSIC, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer (Salamanca, Spain), Salamanca, Spain
María Herrero García
8Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, IBMCC, CSIC, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca, Spain., Hematology Department, Salamanca, Spain
Esperanza Such
Laboratory of Cytogenetics and Molecular Biology. Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
Anna Torrent
Hematology Department. ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute (IJC), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
Rosa Coll
4Hematology service, Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
Marta Cervera
9Hematology Department, - ICO-Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII (Tarragona, Spain), Tarragona, Spain
Clara Maluquer Artigal
Hematology Department. ICO-Duran i Reynals, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain
Jesus Maria Hernandez Rivas
8Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, IBSAL, IBMCC, CSIC, Centro de Investigación del Cáncer, Salamanca, Spain., Hematology Department, Salamanca, Spain
Alberto Orfao
Josep-Maria Ribera
Hematology Department. ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Leukemia Research Institute (IJC), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Spain
Joaquín Martínez-López
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital 12 de Octubre, Complutense University of Madrid, Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Madrid Institute of Cancer, Madrid
Ricardo Sánchez
Hematology Department. Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Instituto de Investigación Hospital 12 de Octubre (i+12) Madrid, Spain