Ag⁺‐Mediated Structural Reconstruction of a Metastable Cu <sub>35</sub> Cluster Toward Cu–Ag Heterometallic Architectures for Superior Electrocatalytic CO <sub>2</sub> ‐to‐Ethanol Conversion

X Xin‐Yu Chen (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha P. R. China) L Lan‐Yan Li (School of Resources and Environment Hunan University of Technology and Business Changsha 410205 China) L Lan‐Cheng Zhao (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shandong University of Science and Technology Zibo Shandong 255000 P.R. China) Q Qing‐Yi Liu (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 P.R. China) D Dang‐Dang Ding (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha P. R. China) L Li‐Li Zhang (Interdisciplinary Research Center For Sustainable Energy Science and Engineering (IRC4SE<sup>2</sup>), School of Chemical Engineering Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China) X Xiao‐Yan Sun (Qingdao Institute of BioEnergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao 266000 P.R. China) L Li‐Kai Wang (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shandong University of Science and Technology Zibo Shandong 255000 P.R. China) H Hong‐Bing Mo (College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 P.R. China) J Jun Yan (School of Materials Science and Engineering) C Chao Liu

Abstract

Abstract Controlled structural transformations of metal nanoclusters (NCs) via dynamic bond reorganization provide fundamental insights into cluster reactivity and open avenues for functionality tuning. Here, we report a thiacalix[4]arene‐protected Cu(I)‐alkynide cluster, {NaCu 35 (TC4A) 4 (Ph‐C≡C) 20 } ( Cu 35 ), which exhibits remarkable structural plasticity. This metastable cluster can grow into a Cu 36 species via ion substitution or undergo thermal‐induced fragmentation to form a smaller Cu 14 cluster. Under thermal etching by Ag + ion, structural reconstruction is triggered, leading to the formation of the bimetallic Cu 14 Ag 6 and Cu 40 Ag 16 clusters. The structural reorganization significantly alters the catalytic outcomes in electrocatalytic CO 2 reduction. Although the monometallic Cu 35 and Cu 14 favor gaseous CH 4 /C 2 H 4 production, the bimetallic Cu 14 Ag 6 demonstrates remarkable selectivity for ethanol synthesis. Notably, Cu 14 Ag 6 achieves an impressive Faradaic efficiency (FE) of 49.27% for ethanol production, alongside a high partial current density of −67.94 mA cm −2 . This marks the highest ethanol selectivity reported to date for atomically precise cluster catalysts. Mechanistic investigations reveal that, compared to homometallic Cu⋯Cu dual sites (which typically favor C 2 H 4 ), the unique Ag⋯Cu⋯Cu trimetallic microstructure in Cu 14 Ag 6 is more thermodynamically favorable for asymmetric C─C coupling between *CHO and *OCH 2 , facilitating the formation of the key *CHO−*OCH 2 intermediate, which drives the ethanol‐selective pathway.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 64, Issue 36
Published September 01, 2025
ISSN 1433-7851
Publisher Wiley

Journal Info

Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Wiley

ISSN: 1433-7851 Physical Sciences

Authors (11)

X

Xin‐Yu Chen

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha P. R. China

L

Lan‐Yan Li

School of Resources and Environment Hunan University of Technology and Business Changsha 410205 China

L

Lan‐Cheng Zhao

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shandong University of Science and Technology Zibo Shandong 255000 P.R. China

Q

Qing‐Yi Liu

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 P.R. China

D

Dang‐Dang Ding

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha P. R. China

L

Li‐Li Zhang

Interdisciplinary Research Center For Sustainable Energy Science and Engineering (IRC4SE<sup>2</sup>), School of Chemical Engineering Zhengzhou University Zhengzhou China

X

Xiao‐Yan Sun

Qingdao Institute of BioEnergy and Bioprocess Technology Chinese Academy of Sciences Qingdao 266000 P.R. China

L

Li‐Kai Wang

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Shandong University of Science and Technology Zibo Shandong 255000 P.R. China

H

Hong‐Bing Mo

College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Central South University Changsha Hunan 410083 P.R. China

J

Jun Yan

School of Materials Science and Engineering

C

Chao Liu