Adjuvant Nivolumab for Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma at High Risk of Recurrence After Nephrectomy: Part B of the Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase III CheckMate 914 Trial

R Robert J. Motzer (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York) A Axel Bex P Paul Russo (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY) Y Yoshihiko Tomita (Department of Urology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental, Niigata-Shi, Japan) H Hernan Javier Cutuli (Hospital Sirio Libanés, Buenos Aires, Argentina) C Carlos Rojas (Bradford Hill Investigación Clínica, Santiago, Chile) M Marine Gross-Goupil (University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France) G Giovanni Schinzari (Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy) B Bohuslav Melichar P Philippe Barthélémy A Abraham Ruiz Garcia (Hospital 1ro de Octubre, Mexico City, Mexico) J Jeffrey Sosman M Marc-Oliver Grimm J Jeffrey C. Goh (ICON Research, South Brisbane & Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia) C Cristina Suarez (Department of Medical Oncology Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain) C Christian K. Kollmannsberger (BC Cancer Vancouver Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada) S Suresh G. Nair (Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA) B Brian M. Shuch J Jian Huang B Burcin Simsek (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) J Julia Spiridigliozzi (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) C Chung-Wei Lee M Maximiliano van Kooten Losio (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) V Viktor Grünwald

Abstract

PURPOSE CheckMate 914 is a two-part, randomized phase III trial evaluating adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab (part A) or adjuvant nivolumab monotherapy (part B) versus placebo in mutually exclusive populations of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC) at high risk of postnephrectomy recurrence. Part A showed no disease-free survival (DFS) benefit for adjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus placebo. We report results from part B. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1) to nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks for up to 12 doses), placebo, or nivolumab (240 mg once every 2 weeks for up to 12 doses) plus ipilimumab (1 mg/kg once every 6 weeks for up to four doses). The planned treatment duration was 24 weeks (approximately 5.5 months). The primary end point was DFS per blinded independent central review (BICR) for nivolumab versus placebo; safety was a secondary end point. RESULTS Overall, 825 patients were randomly assigned to nivolumab (n = 411), placebo (n = 208), or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 206). With a median follow-up of 27.0 months (range, 18.0-42.4), the primary end point of improved DFS per BICR with nivolumab versus placebo was not met (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.21]; P = .40); the median DFS was not reached in either arm, and 18-month DFS rates were 78.4% versus 75.4%. The HR for DFS per investigator was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.58 to 1.12; P = .19). Grade 3-4 all-cause adverse events (AEs) occurred in 17.2%, 15.0%, and 28.9% of patients with nivolumab, placebo, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 9.6%, 1.0%, and 28.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION Part B of CheckMate 914 did not meet the primary end point of improved DFS for nivolumab versus placebo in patients with localized RCC at high risk of postnephrectomy recurrence.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 2
Published January 10, 2025
Pages 189-200
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (24)

R

Robert J. Motzer

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York

A

Axel Bex

P

Paul Russo

Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

Y

Yoshihiko Tomita

Department of Urology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medicine and Dental, Niigata-Shi, Japan

H

Hernan Javier Cutuli

Hospital Sirio Libanés, Buenos Aires, Argentina

C

Carlos Rojas

Bradford Hill Investigación Clínica, Santiago, Chile

M

Marine Gross-Goupil

University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France

G

Giovanni Schinzari

Medical Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy

B

Bohuslav Melichar

P

Philippe Barthélémy

A

Abraham Ruiz Garcia

Hospital 1ro de Octubre, Mexico City, Mexico

J

Jeffrey Sosman

M

Marc-Oliver Grimm

J

Jeffrey C. Goh

ICON Research, South Brisbane & Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

C

Cristina Suarez

Department of Medical Oncology Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Spain

C

Christian K. Kollmannsberger

BC Cancer Vancouver Center, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

S

Suresh G. Nair

Lehigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA

B

Brian M. Shuch

J

Jian Huang

B

Burcin Simsek

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

J

Julia Spiridigliozzi

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

C

Chung-Wei Lee

M

Maximiliano van Kooten Losio

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

V

Viktor Grünwald