Adjuvant Docetaxel and Cyclophosphamide With or Without Epirubicin for Early Breast Cancer: Final Analysis of the Randomized DBCG 07-READ Trial

M Maj-Britt Jensen (Department of Oncology, Danish Breast Cancer Group, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark) E Eva Balslev (Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark) A Ann Søegaard Knoop (Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark) M Malgorzata K. Tuxen (Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark) I Inger Højris (Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark) E Erik H. Jakobsen (Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark) S Søren Cold (Department of Oncology R, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark) H Hella Danø (Department of Oncology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark) V Vesna Glavicic (Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark) J Julia Kenholm (Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Herning, Denmark) B Bent Ejlertsen

Abstract

The primary analysis of the DBCG 07-READ trial reported in 2017 provided evidence of no overall benefit from adjuvant anthracyclines in patients with early TOP2A normal breast cancer in disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), or overall survival (OS). We performed a protocol-scheduled analysis of DDFS, DFS, and OS on the basis of 10-year follow-up. Full details on incident heart failure (HF) and second cancers were presented. Patients in the intention-to-treat population assigned to epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by docetaxel (EC-D) had longer DDFS (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.79 [95% CI, 0.64 to 0.98]; P = .03) and DFS (HR Adjusted , 0.83 [95% CI, 0.69 to 0.99]; P = .04) than patients assigned to docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (DC). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality rates. The 10-year cumulative risk of HF was 2.1% (95% CI, 1.4 to 3.3) with EC-D and 1.1% (95% CI, 0.6 to 2.0) with DC (HR Unadjusted , 2.12 [95% CI, 1.03 to 4.35]; P = .04). In conclusion, anthracycline followed by docetaxel improved outcome compared with DC in patients with TOP2A normal early breast cancer, and no clinical value of TOP2A testing was shown. The risk of HF was doubled in patients receiving anthracycline; however, overall, the risk of HF was low.

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 373-380
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (11)

M

Maj-Britt Jensen

Department of Oncology, Danish Breast Cancer Group, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark

E

Eva Balslev

Department of Pathology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

A

Ann Søegaard Knoop

Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

M

Malgorzata K. Tuxen

Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

I

Inger Højris

Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Skejby, Denmark

E

Erik H. Jakobsen

Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Sønderborg, Denmark

S

Søren Cold

Department of Oncology R, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

H

Hella Danø

Department of Oncology, Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark

V

Vesna Glavicic

Department of Oncology, Zealand University Hospital, Naestved, Denmark

J

Julia Kenholm

Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital Gødstrup, Herning, Denmark

B

Bent Ejlertsen