Adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) benefit in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) by Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and menopausal status.

A Arya Mariam Roy Y Yevgeniya Gokun B Brandon Slover (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) N Nerea Lopetegui-Lia (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) D Dionisia Marie Quiroga (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) K Kai Conrad Cecil Johnson (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) G Gilbert Bader (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) A Ashley Pariser Davenport (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) S Sagar D. Sardesai (The Ohio State University—James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) R Robert Wesolowski S Sara Myers (The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) E Erin E. Burke (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) A Annapurna Gupta (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) S Sarmila Majumder (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) M Margaret E. Gatti-Mays (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) N Nicole Olivia Williams (The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH) D Daniel G. Stover (Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus)

Abstract

540 Background: The benefit of adjuvant CT in early-stage hormone receptor–positive (HR+) and HER2-negative (HER2–) ILC remains uncertain. The predictive utility of the Oncotype DX Recurrence Score (RS), widely used to guide CT decisions in HR+/HER2 BC, remains debated in ILC. To address these gaps, we analyzed the impact of adjuvant CT on overall survival (OS) across RS categories and by menopausal status. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database for patients (pts) with early-stage HR+/HER2– ILC who had surgery between 2010 and 2021. Pts were grouped by receipt of adjuvant CT (CT+ vs CT–). Analyses were stratified by RS (low 0–15, intermediate 16–25, high ≥26) and menopausal status, using age (<50 vs ≥50 years) as a proxy. Overlap propensity score weighting (OPSW) balanced baseline covariates (race, ethnicity, comorbidities, clinical T and N stage, grade and radiation and hormone therapies), and OPSW Cox models assessed the association between time-varying adjuvant CT and OS. Results: Among 141,949 pts with ILC, 19.6% received adjuvant CT. The CT+ cohort was younger (median age 59 vs 67 years) and more often pre-menopausal (21.8 vs 9%), and had high grade tumors (8.7 vs 3.3%), advanced T stage (T2: 39.4 vs 21.8%; T3: 14.9 vs 3.4%), node-positive (N1-3: 22 vs 3.2%) disease and more frequently received radiation (74.6 vs 56.5%) and hormone therapy (93.3 vs 87.5%), all p<0.001. RS testing was available in 38% of pts; CT+ cohort more often had high (9.2 vs 1.2%) or unknown RS (75.4 vs 57.9%), p<0.001. In the high RS group, CT was associated with improved 5-year (93.3 vs 90.5%) and 10-year OS (79.4 vs 71.7%) and lower mortality (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 0.69, p <0.001) (Table 1). Among postmenopausal pts, the survival benefit with CT was greatest in pts with high RS (10-year OS: 78.6 vs 69.2%; aHR 0.65, 95% CI 0.52–0.82, p=0.0003). No OS benefit was observed in low (aHR= 1.16, p= 0.31) or intermediate (aHR= 1.07, p= 0.39) RS groups. Among premenopausal pts, CT benefit was limited to the intermediate RS group (10-year OS: 94.9 vs 91.3%; aHR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33–1.00, p=0.049); no benefit was observed in low (aHR= 1.11, p= 0.77) or high (aHR= 1.50, p= 0.55) RS. Conclusions: In early-stage HR+/HER2– ILC, RS has limited clinical utility. Adjuvant CT benefit was restricted to pts with high RS, predominantly in postmenopausal pts, while RS did not reliably predict benefit in premenopausal pts. No OS benefit was seen in low RS disease, supporting a selective, biology-driven approach to CT use in ILC. CT decisions in pts with unknown RS appear largely driven by clinicopathologic factors. 10-year survival analysis of ILC patients based on CT receipt and RS. RS group OS (%, 95% CI) CT + OS (%, 95% CI) CT - aHR (95% CI) Reference: CT- p-value Low 87.6 (84.6-90.6) 88.9 (88.0-89.9) 1.13 (0.87-1.47) 0.36 Intermediate 86.2 (84.4-88.1) 86.5 (85.3-87.7) 1.02 (0.87-1.20) 0.78 High 79.4 (76.4-82.5) 71.7 (66.9-76.8) 0.69 (0.55-0.87) <0.01

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 44, Issue 16_suppl
Published June 01, 2026
Pages 540-540
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (17)

A

Arya Mariam Roy

Y

Yevgeniya Gokun

B

Brandon Slover

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

N

Nerea Lopetegui-Lia

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

D

Dionisia Marie Quiroga

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

K

Kai Conrad Cecil Johnson

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

G

Gilbert Bader

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

A

Ashley Pariser Davenport

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

S

Sagar D. Sardesai

The Ohio State University—James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

R

Robert Wesolowski

S

Sara Myers

The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

E

Erin E. Burke

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

A

Annapurna Gupta

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

S

Sarmila Majumder

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

M

Margaret E. Gatti-Mays

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

N

Nicole Olivia Williams

The Ohio State University - James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

D

Daniel G. Stover

Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus