Addition of 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET to MRI to avoid unnecessary biopsy in men on active surveillance: Final results from a phase II diagnostic trial (PROMPT).
Abstract
5125 Background: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is used in active surveillance (AS) for prostate cancer (PC) but has limited specificity. This prospective trial evaluated whether combining 18F-DCFPyL PSMA PET with mpMRI improves the detection of clinically significant PC (csPC) in patients on AS and reduces unnecessary biopsies prompted by false-positive mpMRI. Methods: In this IRB-approved, single-arm Phase II study, 91 patients on AS underwent PSMA PET and mpMRI on a dedicated PET/MRI scanner followed by systematic and targeted biopsies. PET and mpMRI were interpreted independently. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI versus the combined PSMA PET/MRI for csPC. Results: Among 246 targeted lesions, the area under the curve (AUC) for combined PSMA PET/MRI was (0.77) compared to mpMRI alone (0.70) (p=0.2). PSMA PET/MRI showed improved specificity (64.6% vs. 27.5%) with a comparable negative predictive value (89.1% vs. 89.7%). Of 57 csPC lesions, 6 (10.5%) were uniquely identified by the combination. Half of the biopsies for false-positive mpMRI or PET lesions (122/246; 50%) encompassing 17/91 (19%) of patients could have been avoided with combined imaging. Management changed in 9% of patients based on PET/MRI. Conclusions: In this first-in-field trial the addition of PSMA PET to mpMRI with dedicated PET/MRI imaging enhances sensitivity in detecting csPC and may reduce the need for unnecessary biopsies in AS patients. Incorporating PSMA PET/MRI into clinical practice could refine surveillance protocols and support biopsy omission in select men with negative imaging. The single health-system nature of the trial may limit the generalizability of our findings. Diagnostic accuracy of the mpMRI, PSMA PET/MRI, and for the combination, assessed using the “AND” operator. a Parameter MRI, PIRADS≥3 PSMA-PET, Likert≥3 MRI, PIRADS≥4 PSMA-PET, Likert≥4 MRI PIRADS≥3 ANDPET Likert≥3 MRI PIRADS≥3 ANDPET Likert≥4 MRI PIRADS≥4 ANDPET Likert≥3 MRI PIRADS≥4 ANDPET Likert≥4 Accuracy 41.9% 48.0% 63.8% 63.8% 66.7% 72.8% 78.5% 79.3% Sensitivity 89.5% 84.2% 71.9% 73.7% 73.7% 64.9% 63.2% 57.9% Specificity 27.5% 37.0% 61.4% 60.8% 64.6% 75.1% 83.1% 85.7% PPV 27.1% 28.7% 36.0% 36.2% 38.5% 44.0% 52.9% 55.0% NPV 89.7% 88.6% 87.9% 88.5% 89.1% 87.7% 88.2% 87.1% Number of lesions (% of 257) 188 (76) 167 (68) 114 (46) 116 (47) 109 (44) 84 (34) 68 (28) 60 (24) a The detection of clinically significant cancer was considered on per-lesion analysis. MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; PET = positron emission tomography; PI-RADS = Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System; PSA = prostate-specific antigen; PSMA = prostate-specific membrane antigen. PPV= positive predictive value, NPV = negative predictive value.
Article Details
Journal Info
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Authors (10)
Marcelo Bigarella
University of Arkansas, Little Rock, AR
Edward Lawrence
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Abigail Wiedmer
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Jenna A. Cava
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Changhee Lee
Jens C. Eickhoff
Wei Huang
Shane Wells
University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
Steve Y. Cho
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
David Frazier Jarrard
University of Wisconsin, Madison, Madison, WI