Adagrasib (Ada) + cetuximab (Cetux) for <i>KRAS</i> <sup>G12C</sup> -mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Longer follow-up analysis from KRYSTAL-1.

R Rona Yaeger N Nataliya V. Uboha S Samuel J. Klempner (Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston) T Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab J Joshua K. Sabari (Division of Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York) M Minal A. Barve (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX) J Joel N. Saltzman (Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH) J Julio Antonio Peguero (Oncology Consultants, Houston, TX) A Andrew Scott Paulson P Pasi A. Jänne M Meredith Pelster (Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville) M Marcia Cruz-Correa (The University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, and Pan-American Center for Oncology Trials, San Juan, Puerto Rico) A Amy Min Kyung Kim (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) N Nan Hu H Harris A. Ahmad (Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ) S Scott Kopetz (University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston)

Abstract

131 Background: KRAS G12C mutations occur in 3%–4% of CRC cases and are associated with poor prognosis. In the phase 1/2 KRYSTAL-1 study (NCT03785249), at a median follow-up of 11.9 months (mo), Ada (irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C ) in combination with Cetux (anti-EGFR antibody) demonstrated promising clinical activity (objective response rate [ORR] of 34% per blinded independent central review [BICR] and 43% per investigator [INV]) and was well tolerated in patients (pts) with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC. Based on these findings, Ada + Cetux was granted accelerated approval in the United States for these pts. Here, we present longer-term follow-up analyses from this study. Methods: Adults with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were treated with Ada (600 mg BID) in combination with Cetux (400 mg/m 2 followed by 250 mg/m 2 QW or 500 mg/m 2 Q2W) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death, in separate phase 1 and phase 2 cohorts. Primary endpoints were safety (phase 1) and ORR per BICR (phase 2). Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (phase 2). Results: A total of 94 pts received Ada + Cetux. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range, 1–9); 23 pts (24%) had received ≥ 4 prior lines of systemic therapy. The most frequent sites of metastases at baseline were the lung (71%) and liver (64%). At a median follow-up of 20.4 mo, ORR per INV was 43% (95% CI 32–53) and all were partial responses; median DOR was 5.9 (95% CI 5.5–7.6) mo. Disease control rate per INV was 86% (95% CI 78–92). Median PFS per INV was 6.9 (95% CI 5.9–7.4) mo; 6- and 12-mo PFS rates were 61% and 19%, respectively. Median OS was 16.0 (95% CI 13.3–18.8) mo; 6- and 12-mo OS rates were 88% and 66%, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 100% of pts, 28% of which were grade 3/4. TRAEs led to discontinuation in 10% of pts. Efficacy analyses by BICR, subgroup analyses, and additional safety results will be presented. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts with KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC, Ada + Cetux continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful activity and tolerable safety with longer follow-up. These updated results are consistent with those from the primary analysis and constitute the longest duration of follow-up for dual KRAS G12C /EGFR blockade in this setting. Efficacy of second-line Ada + Cetux vs chemotherapy in KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC is being investigated in the phase 3 KRYSTAL-10 study (NCT04793958). Clinical trial information: NCT03785249 .

Article Details

Volume / Issue Vol. 43, Issue 4_suppl
Published February 01, 2025
Pages 131-131
ISSN 0732-183X
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

Journal Info

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

ISSN: 0732-183X Health Sciences

Authors (16)

R

Rona Yaeger

N

Nataliya V. Uboha

S

Samuel J. Klempner

Mass General Brigham Cancer Institute, Boston

T

Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab

J

Joshua K. Sabari

Division of Medical Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York

M

Minal A. Barve

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Mary Crowley Cancer Research Center, Dallas, TX

J

Joel N. Saltzman

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland, OH

J

Julio Antonio Peguero

Oncology Consultants, Houston, TX

A

Andrew Scott Paulson

P

Pasi A. Jänne

M

Meredith Pelster

Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville

M

Marcia Cruz-Correa

The University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus, and Pan-American Center for Oncology Trials, San Juan, Puerto Rico

A

Amy Min Kyung Kim

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

N

Nan Hu

H

Harris A. Ahmad

Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

S

Scott Kopetz

University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston